spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEMBI, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by WALNE, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LEMBI, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by WALNE, P. L.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 9, 569-579, Copyright © 1971 by Company of Biologists

Submitted on October 1, 1971
Revised on January 8, 1971

Ultrastructure of Pseudocilia in Tetraspora Lubrica (Roth) AG

CAROLE A. LEMBI 1 and PATRICIA L. WALNE 2

1 The Department of Botany, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee, U.S.A., 37916; Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.A., 47907
2 The Department of Botany, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee, U.S.A., 37916

The flagella-like, but immobile, pseudocilia of the unicellular green alga, Tetraspora lubrica, have been characterized ultrastructurally and compared with the true flagella of the motile green alga, Chlamydomonas. The basal body and transitional regions of the 2 organelle systems are basically similar. Most of the marked differences occur in the pseudocilium proper, and a few important dissimilarities are found in the cytoplasmic portions of the apparatus. The major differences are: (1) 4 instead of 2 proximal striated fibres in the pseudociliary apparatus (2) a proximal-to-distal progressive decrease in subfibre number from 9 doublet fibres to a solitary fibre in the pseudocilium proper; (3) loss of interconnexions among the subfibres in the pseudocilium proper and a concomitant disorientation of those subfibres; (4) absence of major arms (dynein) on the A subfibre of peripheral doublets; (5) absence of the central pair of fibres. These and other differences are discussed with regard to their possible roles in loss of motility.. Additional ultrastructural details - interconnexions between cytoplasmic microtubules and basal body subfibres of pseudocilia and flagella - are described and discussed in terms of their possible roles in the regulation of flagellar movement in motile organisms.

Submitted on October 1, 1971
Revised on January 8, 1971







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1971