spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sorrell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Caterson, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sorrell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Caterson, B.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 91, Issue 1 81-90, Copyright © 1988 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Immunochemical and biochemical comparisons between embryonic chick bone marrow and epiphyseal cartilage chondroitin/dermatan sulphate proteoglycans

JM Sorrell, F Mahmoodian and B Caterson
Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506.

Chrondroitin sulphate proteoglycans obtained from embryonic chick bone marrow and epiphyseal cartilage were compared using immunochemical and biochemical analyses. Proteoglycans from each tissue, separated on CsCl density gradients, under dissociative conditions, into high (1.6 g ml-1), medium (1.5 g ml-1) and low (1.4 g ml-1) buoyant density fractions, were immunochemically analysed, using a panel of monoclonal antibodies that specifically recognize chondroitin 4-/dermatan sulphates, chondroitin 6-sulphate, keratan sulphate, the hyaluronate binding region present on connective tissue proteoglycans, and link protein. The same antibodies were used in Western blot analyses to detect intact proteoglycan monomers and core proteins that had been fractionated by agarose-polyacrylamide and by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Specific differences between marrow and cartilage proteoglycans were detected. In CsCl gradients, marrow proteoglycans displayed a higher degree of heterogeneity in terms of buoyant densities and hexuronate distribution. Keratan sulphate chains were constituents of the majority of 'large' proteoglycans in the marrow; however, a portion of the large proteoglycans in marrow middle buoyant density fraction either lacked keratan sulphate chains or were substituted with a form different from that found on cartilage proteoglycans. Marrow lacked 'small' chondroitin/dermatan sulphate proteoglycans that were present in cartilage and contained a more heterogeneous population of proteoglycans, particularly in the lower buoyant density fractions. Both marrow and cartilage were similar in that they contained, as their major components, large, aggregating proteoglycans and link proteins that were immunochemically and biochemically identical. The significance of these differences between marrow and cartilage proteoglycans remains to be determined, but they may, in part, be responsible for imparting unique characteristics to the haematopoietic extracellular matrices.





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1988