spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singer, I. I.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singer, I. I.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 93, Issue 1 147-154, Copyright © 1989 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Scanning electron microscopy of focal contacts on the substratum attachment surface of fibroblasts adherent to fibronectin

II Singer, DM Kazazis and S Scott
Department of Biochemical and Molecular Pathology, Merck Co., Inc., Merck, Sharp & Dohme Research Labs, Rahway, New Jersey 07065.

We have examined the cell-to-substratum attachment surface of hamster fibroblasts with scanning EM, and describe the surface ultrastructure of focal contacts and microspikes during cellular attachment and spreading on fibronectin. Nil 8 fibroblasts were seeded onto fibronectin-coated glass coverslips in serum-free medium, fixed, and the fibroblast-fibronectin monolayer was separated from the glass and inverted for scanning electron microscopic (EM) analysis. Focal contact development was detected by interference reflection microscopy and correlated with the immunofluorescence microscopic distribution of fibronectin receptor antigens. The cell undersurface appeared smooth and featureless at 0.5 h when focal contacts were undetectable and fibronectin receptors were distributed diffusely. By 1-2 h, undersurface membrane impressions of focal contacts were detected with scanning EM; their size, shape and distribution matched that of focal contacts seen with interference reflection microscopy (IRM). These contacts had smooth external surfaces and were often arranged in chevron-shaped complexes. However, at 4-6 h, the surface texture of focal contacts became fibrous and the contact periphery was delineated with the orifices of membrane-associated vesicles. Development of this filamentous substructure is correlated with the maximum concentration of fibronectin receptors and fibronectin at focal contacts, suggesting that these molecules are involved in the maturation and stabilization of focal contacts.





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1989