|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
Journal of Cell Science, Vol 94, 175-206, Copyright © 1989 by Company of Biologists
Submitted on May 25, 1989
Accepted on July 14, 1989
1 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3PS, England
Confocal scanning optical microscopy (CSOM) is a new optical microscopic technique, which offers significant advantages over conventional microscopy. In laser scanning optical microscopy (SOM), the specimen is scanned by a diffractionlimited spot of laser light, and light transmitted or reflected by the in-focus illuminated volume element (voxel) of the specimen, or the fluorescence emission excited within it by the incident light, is focused onto a photodetector. As the illuminating spot is scanned over the specimen, the electrical output from this detector is displayed at the appropriate spatial position on a TV monitor, thus building up a two-dimensional image.
In the confocal mode, an aperture, usually slightly smaller in diameter than the Airy disc image, is positioned in the image plane in front of the detector, at a position confocal with the in-focus voxel. Light emanating from this in-focus voxel thus passes through the aperture to the detector, while that from any region above or below the focal plane is defocused at the aperture plane and is thus largely prevented from reaching the detector, contributing essentially nothing to the confocal image. It is this ability to reduce out-of-focus blur, and thus permit accurate non-invasive optical sectioning, that makes confocal scanning microscopy so well suited for the imaging and three-dimensional tomography of stained biological specimens.
In this review, I explain the principles of scanning optical microscopy and blur-free confocal imaging, discuss the various imaging modes of confocal microscopy, and illustrate some of its early applications.
Key words: cellular tomography, confocal microscopy, fluroscence microscopy, immunoflorescence, out-of-focus blur removal, optical sctioning, scanning optical microscopy, three-dimensional imaging
Submitted on May 25, 1989
Accepted on July 14, 1989
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Guinard, Y. Usson, C. Guillermet, and R. Saxod PS-100 and NF 70-200 Double Immunolabeling for Human Digital Skin Meissner Corpuscle 3D Imaging J. Histochem. Cytochem., February 1, 2000; 48(2): 295 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. NISHIO, Y. SUZUKI, T. AOKI, K. SUZUKI, A. MIYATA, N. SATO, K. NAOKI, H. KUDO, H. TSUMURA, H. SERIZAWA, et al. Differential Contribution of Various Adhesion Molecules to Leukocyte Kinetics in Pulmonary Microvessels of Hyperoxia-exposed Rat Lungs Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 1997; 157(2): 599 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. M. Henderson, G. Banting, and J. B. Chappell The Arachidonate-activable, NADPH Oxidase-associated H[IMAGE] Channel J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 1995; 270(11): 5909 - 5916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P Buchenau, H Saumweber, and D. Arndt-Jovin Consequences of topoisomerase II inhibition in early embryogenesis of Drosophila revealed by in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy J. Cell Sci., January 4, 1993; 104(4): 1175 - 1185. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P Roussel, C Andre, C Masson, G Geraud, and D Hernandez-Verdun Localization of the RNA polymerase I transcription factor hUBF during the cell cycle J. Cell Sci., January 2, 1993; 104(2): 327 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Cremer, A. Kurz, R. Zirbel, S. Dietzel, B. Rinke, E. Schrock, M.R. Speicher, U. Mathieu, A. Jauch, P. Emmerich, et al. Role of Chromosome Territories in the Functional Compartmentalization of the Cell Nucleus Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 1993; 58(0): 777 - 792. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
