spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search    

The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
JCS ePress online publication date 18 Apr 2006
doi: 10.1242/jcs.02913


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcs.02913v1
119/10/1985    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Article

Inefficient reprogramming of the hematopoietic stem cell genome following nuclear transfer


Kimiko Inoue, Narumi Ogonuki, Hiromi Miki, Michiko Hirose, Shinichi Noda, Jin-Moon Kim, Fugaku Aoki, Hiroyuki Miyoshi, and Atsuo Ogura*
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ogura{at}rtc.riken.go.jp)

In general, cloning undifferentiated preimplantation embryos (blastomeres) or embryonic stem cells is more efficient than cloning differentiated somatic cells. Therefore, there has been an assumption that tissue-specific stem cells might serve as efficient donors for nuclear transfer because of the undifferentiated state of their genome. Here, we show that this is not the case with adult hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Although we have demonstrated for the first time that mouse HSCs can be cloned to generate offspring, the birth rates (0-0.7%) were lowest among the clones tested (cumulus, immature Sertoli and fibroblast cells). Only 6% of reconstructed embryos reached the morula or blastocyst stage in vitro (versus 46% for cumulus clones; P<5x10-10). Transcription and gene expression analyses of HSC clone embryos revealed that they initiated zygotic gene activation (ZGA) at the appropriate timing, but failed to activate five out of six important embryonic genes examined, including Hdac1 (encoding histone deacetylase 1), a key regulator of subsequent ZGA. These results suggest that the HSC genome has less plasticity than we imagined, at least in terms of reprogrammability in the ooplasm after nuclear transfer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Wada, J. Kikuchi, N. Nishimura, R. Shimizu, T. Kitamura, and Y. Furukawa
Expression Levels of Histone Deacetylases Determine the Cell Fate of Hematopoietic Progenitors
J. Biol. Chem., October 30, 2009; 284(44): 30673 - 30683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. Hochedlinger and K. Plath
Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency
Development, February 15, 2009; 136(4): 509 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. Magnani and R. A Cabot
Manipulation of SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 transcript levels in porcine embryos differentially alters development and expression of SMARCA1, SOX2, NANOG, and EIF1
Reproduction, January 1, 2009; 137(1): 23 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
T. Nakamura, K. Inoue, S. Ogawa, H. Umehara, N. Ogonuki, H. Miki, T. Kimura, A. Ogura, and T. Nakano
Effects of Akt signaling on nuclear reprogramming
Genes Cells, December 1, 2008; 13(12): 1269 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A.L Green, D.N Wells, and B Oback
Cattle Cloned from Increasingly Differentiated Muscle Cells
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 395 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. K Berg, C. Li, G. Asher, D. N Wells, and B. Oback
Red Deer Cloned from Antler Stem Cells and Their Differentiated Progeny
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 384 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Li, V. Greco, G. Guasch, E. Fuchs, and P. Mombaerts
Mice cloned from skin cells
PNAS, February 20, 2007; 104(8): 2738 - 2743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E. Mizutani, H. Ohta, S. Kishigami, N. Van Thuan, T. Hikichi, S. Wakayama, M. Kosaka, E. Sato, and T. Wakayama
Developmental ability of cloned embryos from neural stem cells.
Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 849 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006