spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search    

The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
JCS ePress online publication date 6 Jan 2009
doi: 10.1242/jcs.034058


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcs.034058v1
122/3/368    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaden, D.
Right arrow Articles by Multhaup, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaden, D.
Right arrow Articles by Multhaup, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Article

Subcellular localization and dimerization of APLP1 are strikingly different from APP and APLP2


Daniela Kaden, Philipp Voigt, Lisa-Marie Munter, Karolina D. Bobowski, Michael Schaefer, and Gerd Multhaup*
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: multhaup{at}chemie.fu-berlin.de)

The molecular association between APP and its mammalian homologs has hardly been explored. In systematically addressing this issue, we show by live cell imaging that APLP1 mainly localizes to the cell surface, whereas APP and APLP2 are mostly found in intracellular compartments. Homo- and heterotypic cis interactions of APP family members could be detected by FRET and co-immunoprecipitation analysis and occur in a modular mode. Only APLP1 formed trans interactions, supporting the argument for a putative specific role of APLP1 in cell adhesion. Deletion mutants of APP family members revealed two highly conserved regions as important for the protein crosstalk. In particular, the N-terminal half of the ectodomain was crucial for APP and APLP2 interactions. By contrast, multimerization of APLP1 was only partially dependent on this domain but strongly on the C-terminal half of the ectodomain. We further observed that coexpression of APP with APLP1 or APLP2 leads to diminished generation of A{beta}42. The current data suggest that this is due to the formation of heteromeric complexes, opening the way for novel therapeutic strategies targeting these complexes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Harmeier, C. Wozny, B. R. Rost, L.-M. Munter, H. Hua, O. Georgiev, M. Beyermann, P. W. Hildebrand, C. Weise, W. Schaffner, et al.
Role of Amyloid-{beta} Glycine 33 in Oligomerization, Toxicity, and Neuronal Plasticity
J. Neurosci., June 10, 2009; 29(23): 7582 - 7590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009