spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SUTHERLAND, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SUTHERLAND, J. L.

Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, Vol s2-76, 145-173, Copyright © 1934 by Company of Biologists

Memoirs: Protozoa from Australian Termites

JEAN L. SUTHERLAND M.Sc.1

1 Zoology Department, The University of Melbourne

1. A list is given of protozoa previously described from termites of different countries, and now recorded from Australian termites.

2. Observations on division stages of Janicki's ‘stout form’ of Devescovina striata do not support his contention that the ‘stout form’ is a pre-division stage of the ‘slender form’.

3. A new species Spirotrichonympha grandis is described from Porotermes grandis Holmgr.

4. The protozoa of Stolotermes victoriensis Hill include a new genus, Spirotrichosoma, of which two species occur--Spirotrichosoma obtusa and Spirotrichosoma capitata.

5. A Trichomonad flagellate from Porotermes grandis, mentioned but not described by Kirby, has distinctive characters which mark it as a new species, Pseudotrypanosoma minimum.

6. A new genus Pseudodevescovina (Pseudodevescovina uniflagellata) is described from Calotermes insularis White.

7. Mastotermes darwiniensis Progg., the most primitive known termite, contains in addition to a ciliate, Nycto-therus termitis, large and unusual flagellates for which the genera Mixotricha (Mixotricha paradoxa) and Deltotrichonympha (Deltotrichonympha operculata) have been erected. The morphology and possible affinities of these forms are of great interest.

8. Observations made on the ‘centroblepharoplast’ of Spirotrichosoma obtusa tend to show that this organ is in this form primarily skeletal rather than neuromotor in function. Division stages show that in Spirotrichosoma obtusa the axial organ does not function as a centrosome, so that the term ‘centroblepharoplast’ is inexact for this form. An analogous skeletal or supporting structure is found in Deltotrichonympha.







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1933