spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MOY-THOMAS, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MOY-THOMAS, J. A.

Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, Vol s2-76, 481-498, Copyright © 1934 by Company of Biologists

Memoirs: On the Teeth of the Larval Belone vulgaris, and the Attachment of Teeth in Fishes

J. A. MOY-THOMAS B.A.1

1 Demonstrator in Zoology in the University of Leeds

1. The upper jaw teeth of the larval Bel one pierce the epidermis as solid structures, unattached to the bone and afterwards become attached by the growth of their bases directly to the premaxilla. These teeth are very similar in structure to those of the larval Eel. A curious feature is shown in their development, the original dentine cone becoming clear apparently to form enamel-like substance.

2. The lower jaw and pharyngeal teeth of the larval Belone develop as hollow cones of dentine, and become attached to the bone either directly or by means of separate ‘intermediate’ pediments of bone.

3. All the teeth of Salmo, Amia, Acipenser, and Polypterus are attached to the bone directly or to upgrowths more or less continuous with the bones.

4. The bony ‘intermediate’ plates of the Dipnoi fuse to form the adult tooth-plate, the actual denticles disappearing.

5. The supporting pediments are shown to be only bony supports developed precociously in connexion with the teeth, and may be formed directly from the bone or separately as ‘intermediate’ pediments, and are in no way different from the remainder of the bone.

6. The embryology of teeth and bone in fishes suggests that they are distinct structures, and that their close association in ontogeny and phylogeny is due to the necessity of acquiring a firm base, and not because they are parts of the same structure.







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1934