spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, O. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hutchison, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, O. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hutchison, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Both emerin and lamin C depend on lamin A for localization at the nuclear envelope

O. Anthony Vaughan1, Mauricio Alvarez-Reyes1, Joanna M. Bridger2, Jos L. V. Broers3, Frans C. S. Ramaekers3, Manfred Wehnert4, Glen E. Morris5, William G. F. Whitfield6 and Christopher J. Hutchison1,*

1 Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
2 Department of Biology and Biochemistry, The University of Brunel, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK
3 Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, University Maastricht, PO Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands
4 Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Institute of Human Genetics, Fleischmannstrasse 42-44, 17487 Greifswald, Germany
5 MRIC, North East Wales Institute, Plas Coch, Mold Road, Wrexham, LL11 2AW, Wales
6 Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: c.j.hutchison{at}durham.ac.uk )



View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Co-immunoprecipitation of in vitro translated lamins and emerin. Human lamins A (lamA), B1 (lamB), C (lamC), human Nup153 (Nup) and emerin were translated as 35S-met labelled proteins in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. Lysates were mixed in the following combinations to give approximately equal starting amounts of radiolabelled protein: (A,B) Emerin+lamin C+Nup; emerin+lamin A+Nup; emerin+lamin B+Nup. (C,D) Emerin+lamin C+lamin B; emerin+lamin A+lamin B; emerin+lamin A+lamin C. (F) Lamin A, lamin B1, lamin C and emerin translated separately and not mixed. E shows a lower exposure of a lamin A+lamin B+emerin co-immunoprecipitation. The area corresponding to the lamin A and lamin B bands is presented. Two bands are clearly visible. Immunoprecipitations were performed with MANEM3 and -5 in combination (MANEM pull downs (A,C,E)). B and D show starting mixtures. Immunoprecipitates or samples of starting lysates were resolved on 8% SDS PAGE and fluorographed. § indicates the position of lamin A; — indicates the position of lamin B; + indicates the position of lamin C; = indicates the position of emerin; * indicates the position of Nup153.

 


View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Comparison of emerin and lamin C distributions in SW13 and HeLa cells. The level of expression of different lamins was compared in HeLa (A) and SW13 cells (B) by immunoblotting. Nuclei isolated from 106 cells were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose and immunoblotted with mAbs JoL2 (lamin A/C), JoL4 (lamin A), LN43 (lamin B2), rabbit polyclonal anti-lamin C or goat anti-lamin B1 using a multi-blot apparatus. The distribution of lamin C (blocks C and D), lamin A (blocks C and D), emerin (blocks E and F) and LAP2ß (blocks E and F) in HeLa cells (blocks C and E) and SW13 cells (blocks D and F) were investigated by indirect immunofluorescence using polyclonal anti-lamin C, JoL4, MANEM5 and LAP17, respectively. In all samples the distribution of DNA was detected with DAPI. Bars, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Co-localisation of emerin and calreticulin in SW13 cells. The distribution of emerin (MANEM3) was compared with the distribution of calreticulin (ER) in SW13 cells by indirect immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. The distribution of DNA was detected using DAPI. Bar, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (46K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. GFP-emerin forms aggregates within a sub-domain of the ER in SW13 cells. GFP-emerin was transiently expressed in SW13 cells (rows A-D) or HeLa cells (row E) and its distribution was compared with lamin C (row A), lamin B1 (row B), lamin B2 (row C) or calreticulin (row D, ER) after fixation. In each sample the distribution of DNA was revealed with DAPI. Images are displayed as individual black and white panels and as three-colour merged images. In merged images `yellow' indicates spectral overlap between red and green signals. Arrowheads (row D) indicate the position of emerin aggregates within the ER. Bars, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The distribution of lamin C and emerin in lymphoblastoid cell lines. EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines were obtained from a donor control (row A) and from an AD EDMD patient with a single point mutation giving rise to an amino acid substitution at position T528K (row B). Each cell line was co-stained with rabbit anti-lamin C (Lamin C) and MANEM5 (emerin). The distribution of DNA in each sample was detected with DAPI. Panels show individual black and white micrographs or three-colour merged images (merge) in which the distribution of DAPI is shown in blue, lamin C in green and emerin in red/orange. In merged images, `yellow' indicates spectral overlap between red and green signals. Bar, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The distribution of emerin and lamin C in SW13 cells stably transfected with GFP-lamin A (SW13/20). The distribution of lamin C, emerin and LAP2ß in SW13 cells was investigated by antibody staining using rabbit anti-lamin C (Lamin C, row A), MANEM5 (emerin, row B) and LAP17 (LAP2, row C), respectively. In each case, antibody distribution was compared with the distribution of GFP-lamin A (GFP). The distribution of DNA in each sample was detected with DAPI. Each panel displays individual black and white images and three-colour merged images (merge) in which DAPI is displayed in blue, GFP-lamin A in green and antibody staining in red. In merged images `yellow' indicates spectral overlap between red and green signals. Bars, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (67K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Transient transfection of SW13 with GFP-lamin A, but not GFP-lamin C, rescues endogenous emerin and lamin C distributions. The distribution of lamin C and emerin was investigated in SW13 cells following transient transfection with GFP-lamin A (rows A,B) or GFP-lamin C (rows C,D). The distribution of endogenous lamin C and emerin was detected by immunofluorescence as described in Materials and Methods. The distribution of DNA was detected with DAPI. In each panel the distributions of DNA, GFP or antibody staining are presented as individual black and white images or as three-colour merged images in which antibody staining is shown in red, GFP-lamin A is shown in green and DAPI is shown in blue. In merged images `yellow' indicates spectral overlap between red and green signals. The arrows in A indicate the position of a mitotic cell. Bars, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. The effects of a dominant negative mutant of lamin B1 on lamin distribution in HeLa cells. A GFP-fusion of a dominant negative lamin B1 mutant (GFP-Delta 2+) was transiently transfected into HeLa cells. The distribution of lamin A (row A), lamin C (row B), lamin B1 (row C) and lamin B2 (row D) in transfected cells was compared with untransfected cells by antibody staining with JoL2, rabbit anti-lamin C, goat anti-lamin B1 and LN43, respectively. The distribution of DNA was detected with DAPI. Each panel displays either individual black and white images or three-colour merged images in which DAPI is shown in blue, GFP-Delta 2+ in green and antibody staining in red. Bar, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. The influence of GFP-Delta 2+ on the distribution of emerin and LAP2ß in HeLa cells. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with GFP-delta 2+ and the distributions of emerin (row A) and LAP2ß (row B) were compared in transfected and untransfected cells by immunofluorescence using MANEM5 (emerin) and LAP17 (LAP2). The distribution of DNA was detected with DAPI. Panel displays individual black and white micrographs or three-colour merged images in which DAPI is shown in blue, GFP-Delta 2+ in green and antibody staining in red. In merged images `yellow' indicates spectral overlap between red and green images. Bar, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Emerin is located in aggregates within the ER in HeLa cells transfected with GFP-delta 2+. The distribution of emerin was compared with the distribution of calreticulin in cells that were transiently transfected with GFP-delta 2+ by four-channel fluorescence. Transfected cells were stained with DAPI to reveal the distribution of DNA; with MANEM5 (Cy5) to reveal the distribution of emerin; and with rabbit anti-calreticulin (TRITC) to reveal the distribution of calreticulin within the ER. Images are displayed either as individual black and white panels or a four-colour merged image in which DAPI is displayed in blue, GFP-delta 2+ in green, calreticulin in red, and emerin in white. It should be noted that when calreticulin staining was omitted no bleed through between the Cy5 and the TRITC filters was observed. Bars, 10 µm.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001