spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miao, H.
Right arrow Articles by Chien, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miao, H.
Right arrow Articles by Chien, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Differential regulation of Rho GTPases by ß1 and ß3 integrins: the role of an extracellular domain of integrin in intracellular signaling

Hui Miao1, Song Li1,*, Ying-Li Hu1, Suli Yuan1, Yihua Zhao1, Benjamin P. C. Chen1,§, Wilma Puzon-McLaughlin2, Takehiko Tarui2, John Y.-J. Shyy1,{ddagger}, Yoshikazu Takada2, Shunichi Usami1 and Shu Chien1

1 Department of Bioengineering and The Whitaker Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla CA 92093-0427, USA
2 Department of Vascular Biology VB-1, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
* Present address: Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
{ddagger} Present address: Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
§ Present address: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, MS 74-157, Berkeley, CA, USA



View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Morphological changes in different types of CHO cells after plating on fibronectin and fibrinogen. CHO (A), ß1 (B), ß3 (C) and ß1-3-1 (D) cells were plated for 4 hours on slides coated with fibronectin. ß3 (E) and ß1-3-1 (F) cells were also plated for 4 hours on slides coated with fibrinogen. Staining of actin was observed by confocal microscopy. In G, the percentage of cells with central stress fibers was determined in CHO, ß1, ß3 and ß1-3-1 cells seeded on fibronectin-coated slides for 2, 4 and 16 hours. Error bars represent standard deviations from three separate experiments (*P<0.05 compared with CHO cells).

 


View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Regulation of Rho activity by cell adhesion to fibronectin. After starvation of cells in 0.5% serum for 20 hours, CHO (A), ß1 (B), ß3 (C) and ß1-3-1 (D) cells were trypsinized and kept in suspension in DMEM for 1 hour and then plated on culture dishes coated with fibronectin for various durations in the absence of serum. The amount of activated RhoA was determined by RBD pull down assay. The top panels in A-D show RBD-bound RhoA from cell lysates. The bottom immunoblot shows RhoA in whole cell lysates. For each cell type, the results of densitometric analysis of RBD-bound RhoA were normalized by the RhoA in whole cell lysates and plotted as a ratio of the results (mean±s.d. from three experiments). Asterisks indicate significant difference (P<0.05) from the ratio of 1. (E) RhoA activities of CHO, ß1, ß3 and ß1-3-1 cells in suspension, normalized for whole cell lysates and expressed as a ratio to CHO cells (mean±s.d. from three experiments). There was no significant difference among the four groups of cells in suspension.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Regulation of Rac1 activity by cell adhesion to fibronectin. 0.5% serum-starved CHO, ß1, ß3 and ß1-3-1 cells were detached and kept in suspension in DMEM for 1 hour and then either plated on fibronectin-coated dishes for 4 hours (A) or used as suspension controls (B). Rac1 activity was determined by a PBD assay followed by immunoblotting with an anti-Rac1 antibody. The bottom immunoblot shows Rac1 in whole cell lysates. The amount of activated Rac1 was normalized by the amount of Rac1 in whole cell lysates. The bar graphs are densitometric analyses of mean±s.d. from three separate experiments. The asterisk indicates significant differences (P<0.05) compared with CHO cells.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Regulation of PI 3-kinase and JNK activities by cell adhesion to fibronectin, and the effect of PI 3-kinase inhibitor on the adhesion induction of Rac1 activation. 0.5% serum-starved CHO, ß1, ß3 and ß1-3-1 cells were detached and kept in suspension in DMEM for 1 hour and then plated on fibronectin-coated dishes for 4 hours. In A, cell lysates from the various samples following adhesion to fibronectin were immunoprecipitated with anti-PI 3-kinase p85 antibody followed by the PI 3-kinase activity assay. Shown at the bottom is the amount of PI 3-kinase p85 immunoprecipitated from 200 µg cell lysates, indicating that comparable amounts of PI 3-kinase p85 were immunoprecipitated in these samples. (B) The effect of a PI 3-kinase inhibitor, LY294002, on adhesion induction of Rac1 activity is shown in the top panel. The bottom immunoblot shows Rac1 in whole cell lysates. The amount of activated Rac1 was normalized by the amount of Rac1 in whole cell lysates. (C) The top panel shows JNK kinase activity using GST-c-Jun as the substrate, and the bottom panel is the immunoblot using anti-JNK1, which indicates equal loading. The bar graphs in A-C are the densitometric analyses, representing the mean±s.d. of three separate experiments. The asterisks in A and C indicate significant differences (P<0.05) compared with CHO cells, and the asterisk in B indicates a significant difference (P<0.05) compared with cells without the PI 3-kinase inhibitor.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Attachment and detachment of cells on fibronectin. (A) Cells were seeded on fibronectin-coated wells and the percentage of bound cells was quantified by the adhesion assay described in the Materials and Methods. (B) Cells were seeded on fibronectin-coated slides and then subjected to a dislodging shear stress of 250 dyn/cm2. The percentage of detached cells was quantified. Bars represent mean±s.d. of three separate experiments.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002