spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, K.
Right arrow Articles by Baldwin, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, K.
Right arrow Articles by Baldwin, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Activation of GLUT1 by metabolic and osmotic stress: potential involvement of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)

Kay Barnes1,*, Jean C. Ingram1, Omar H. Porras2, L. Felipe Barros2, Emma R. Hudson3, Lee G. D. Fryer4, Fabienne Foufelle5, David Carling4, D. Grahame Hardie3 and Stephen A. Baldwin1

1 School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
2 Centro de Estudios Científicos CECS, Casilla 1469, Valdivia, Chile
3 Biochemistry Department, Dundee University, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK
4 Cellular Stress Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK
5 U465 INSERM, Centre de Recherches Biomédical des Cordeliers, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of metabolic stress on surface labelling of GLUT1 in Clone 9 cells by a membrane-impermeant photoaffinity reagent. Clone 9 cells were incubated with or without 5 mM sodium azide for 30 minutes, as indicated, then photolabelled with 500 µM Bio-LC-ATB-BMPA in the absence or presence of 400 mM glucose (lane 3) or 20 µM cytochalasin B (lane 4). A control sample (lane 5) was also UV-irradiated in the absence of Bio-LC-ATB-BMPA. Following cell lysis with 1% TX-100, samples of total lysate proteins (a) and of biotinylated cell-surface proteins isolated by adsorption to streptavidin agarose (b) were subjected to western blotting to detect GLUT1, as described in the Materials and Methods. The mobilities of the molecular mass markers are indicated on the left.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of AICAR exposure on the kinetic parameters of hexose uptake. Clone 9 cells were treated for 60 minutes with (open symbols) or without (closed symbols) 500 µM AICAR. Uptake of [3H]3-O-methyl-D-glucose was then measured at 6°C in the presence of increasing concentrations of hexose as described in the Materials and Methods. Transport parameters were estimated by direct fitting of a rectangular hyperbola to the data using non-linear regression (Sigma Plot, Jandel). Data shown are means±s.e.m. (3).

 


View larger version (80K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of AICAR exposure on the abundance of cell-surface GLUT1. Clone 9 cells were exposed for 60 minutes to buffer only (a) or to 500 µM AICAR (b) or for 24 hours to 250 µM CoCl2 (c). Plasma membrane lawns were prepared, immunostained and quantified as described in the Materials and Methods. Data were pooled from two experiments in which eight fields were measured, each containing an average of 12 cells. The image intensity data (arbitrary units) shown beneath the images are means±s.e.m. [(8) number of fields]. *Significantly different (P<0.05) from the control (ANOVA plus Bonferroni's ad hoc test); NS, not significantly different from the control. Scale bar, 100 µm.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. AMPK {alpha} subunit isoforms and their phosphorylation in response to treatment of Clone 9 cells with sodium azide, AICAR and hypertonic sorbitol. Confluent dishes of cells were untreated (basal), exposed to 5 mM sodium azide (azide), 500 µM AICAR (AICAR) or 0.4 M sorbitol (sorbitol) for 60 minutes. Western blots of cell lysates were probed with antibodies against the {alpha}1 subunit of AMPK (a), against the {alpha}2 subunit (b) or with an antibody specific for the Thr172-phosphorylated forms of the {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 AMPK subunits (c). The mobilities of molecular mass markers are indicated on the right. Arrows denote the position of the 63 kDa AMPK {alpha} subunits.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Comparison of the effects of exposure to azide and of infection by an adenovirus encoding ca-AMPK, or lacking AMPK, on hexose transport. Clone 9 cells in triplicate culture dishes were maintained uninfected (none) or infected with adenovirus either encoding ca-AMPK (ca) or lacking the AMPK gene (null) for 48 hours. The cells were washed twice with PBS and treated for 30 minutes with (azide) or without (basal) 5 mM azide. Uptake of [3H]3-O-methyl-D-glucose was then measured as described in the Materials and Methods. Results shown in (a) are means±s.e.m. (3). In parallel, western blots of cell lysates (10 µg protein) were prepared as described in the Materials and Methods section and stained with mouse antibodies to c-myc (b). The mobilities of molecular weight markers are indicated on the left. *This value is significantly different (P<0.05) from basal uptake rate in non-infected cells and from basal uptake rate in cells infected with adenovirus lacking the AMPK coding region.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Comparison of the effects of (a) Gö 6976 and (b) Gö 6850 on metabolic stress-stimulated hexose transport. Clone 9 cells in triplicate culture dishes were treated with or without the indicated concentrations of inhibitors for 45 minutes. During the last 30 minutes of this period, they were treated with (azide) or without (basal) 5 mM sodium azide. Uptake of (a) [3H]3-O-methyl-D-glucose or (b) [3H]2-deoxy-D-glucose was then measured as described in the Materials and Methods. Results shown are the means±s.e.m.; *this value is significantly different (P<0.05) from the azide-stimulated uptake rate in the absence of the inhibitor.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002