spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, M.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson-Haidaris, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, M.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson-Haidaris, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The incorporation of fibrinogen into extracellular matrix is dependent on active assembly of a fibronectin matrix

Marian Pereira1,2, Brain J. Rybarczyk1,2, Tatjana M. Odrljin1, Denise C. Hocking3, Jane Sottile4 and Patricia J. Simpson-Haidaris1,2,5

1 Department of Medicine-Vascular Medicine Unit, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
3 Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
4 Center for Cardiovascular Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
5 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA



View larger version (114K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Time course of FBG assembly into the ECM. Confluent human foreskin fibroblasts were incubated with 30 µg/ml Oregon-Green FBG for 1 (A,B), 6 (C,D) or 24 hours (E,F). Cells were washed, fixed and stained with affinity-purified (to remove contaminating antibodies to FBG) rabbit anti-FN IgG, followed by incubation with rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (B,D,F). Panels (A,C,E) represent FBG-Oregon-Green fluorescence. Bar in (E) represents 25 µm.

 


View larger version (78K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The effect of serum starvation and LPA on FBG assembly in the ECM of fibroblasts. Confluent monolayers of human foreskin fibroblasts were serum-starved for 24 hours. Medium containing 10% FBS (A,B), no FBS (C,D) or 500 nM LPA (E,F) supplemented with 40 µg/ml FBG-Oregon Green was added to cells and incubated for an additional 18 hours. FBG is shown in (A,C,E), and HSPG staining is shown in (B,D,F). Bar in (F) represents 25 µm.

 


View larger version (77K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. FBG assembly into mature matrix fibrils is Rho dependent. Human foreskin fibroblasts were serum starved for 24 hours prior to treatment with 1% FBS-medium with (A) or without (B) PLB (0.1 U/ml) in the presence of FBG-Oregon Green (40 µg/ml). To inhibit RhoA activation, C3 transferase (2 µg/ml) was delivered to serum-starved HFF via LipofectAMINE (10 µg/ml) (C); control cells were treated only with LipofectAMINE (10 µg/ml) (D). FBG-Oregon Green (30 µg/ml) in 1% FBS-medium was added to cells and incubated for an additional 4 hours. Bar in (B) represents 25 µm.

 


View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of 9D2 on FBG matrix deposition and recovery. Confluent human foreskin fibroblasts were treated with 30 µg/ml 9D2 for 18 hours. This was followed by incubation with 30 µg/ml FBG-Oregon-Green in the continued presence (A-F) or absence of 9D2 (G-L). MoAb 9D2 was removed (G-L) by washing the cells after the 18 hours treatment. Cells were washed, fixed and stained for FN (B,D,F,H,J,L). Bars in (E) and (K) represent 25 µm.

 


View larger version (90K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. FN and FBG incorporation into FN-/- cell matrix. Confluent FN-/- cells were incubated with 20 µg/ml FBG-Oregon Green in the presence (A-C) or absence (D-F) of 10 µg/ml FN. FN (A,D), FBG (B,E) and phase contrast (C,F) images are shown. Bar in (F) represents 25 µm.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Binding of 125I-FN to FN-/- cell layers. Confluent FN-/- cell layers grown in 48 well plates were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with 0.2 ml defined medium containing 0.2% BSA and increasing concentrations of 125I-FN. Nonspecific binding (closed triangles) was determined by adding excess unlabeled FN (500 µg/ml) to the incubation medium. Specific binding (closed circles) was assessed by subtracting nonspecific binding from total binding (open squares). Each point represents the average of triplicate determinations from a representative experiment. Bars represent±s.e.m.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Effect of MoAb 9D2 on 125I-FBG binding to FN-/- cell layers. Confluent FN-/- cell layers grown in 48-well plates were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with 0.2 ml defined medium containing 0.2% BSA, FN (25.8 µg/ml) and 125I-FBG (20 µg/ml) in the presence of increasing concentrations of MoAb 9D2 (closed squares) or nonimmune IgG1 (open circles). After 1 hour of binding, cell monolayers were washed, solubilized in 1N NaOH and radioactivity measured. Binding of 125I-FBG is expressed as percentage of binding observed in the absence of 9D2. These data are representative of two experiments each done in triplicate at each IgG1 concentration. Bars represent±s.e.m.

 


View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Effect of 9D2 on FBG and FN incorporation into ECM. Confluent FN-/- cells were treated with FN (25.8 µg/ml) and FBG (20 µg/ml) in the absence (A-C) or presence (D-F) of 35 µg/ml MoAb 9D2 or nonimmune mouse IgG1 (G-I). Cells were washed, fixed and stained for FBG in green fluorescence (A,D,G) and FN in red fluorescence (B,E,H). Insets represent background staining for green (D) and red (E) fluorescence. Composite images shown in (C,F,I) indicate colocalization of FBG and FN in yellow-orange fluorescence. Bar in panel I represents 25 µm.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002