spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.00488


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schnapp, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schnapp, B. J.

Trafficking of signaling modules by kinesin motors

Bruce J. Schnapp

Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201-3098, USA



View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Recently identified cargoes for kinesins are built according to a common design plan. With the exception of the transmembrane protein APP, kinesins are linked to cytosolic scaffold proteins that have multiple binding sites for other proteins, including a transmembrane protein that defines the cargo. Kinesin tails and transmembrane receptors are connected to the linkers by modular protein-protein interactions. A large fraction of the linkers discovered thus far are scaffold proteins for signaling pathways.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Two examples where subcellular localization of signaling modules is essential. Cell fate specification in the worm sex organ and the fly eye occur in epithelia. In each case, an inducing cell (anchor cell or cell R8) provides a ligand (secreted EGF or transmembrane protein BOSS) that interacts with a receptor tyrosine kinase (Let-27 or sevenless) to activate a canonical Ras/MAPK pathway. The MAPK pathway directs a precursor (vulval precursor or Cell R7) toward a particular cell fate. In the case of vulva cell fate specification in C. elegans, the anchor cell is in the stroma, and therefore Let-27, and presumably its downstream targets, must reside in the basolateral compartment to receive the signal. In the fly eye, both the receptor, sevenless and the ligand, BOSS, are located in the microvilli of the apical compartment.

 


View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. KIF17 and kinesin I cargo interactions compared and contrasted. The signaling scaffold JIP links kinesin I to the transmembrane receptor, ApoER2; the LIN signaling scaffold links KIF17 to the transmembrane protein, NR2B, a subunit of the NMDA-sensitive glutamate receptor. The kinesin-linker interactions are strikingly similar, suggesting a general model for how modular protein-protein interactions underlie kinesin-cargo specificity. In both cases, the kinesin-linker interactions involve a protein-binding module (TPRs or PDZ) designed to recognize specific motifs at the C-termini of partner proteins. In the case of kinesin I, the protein-binding module (TPRs) is in the kinesin tail, and the motif is in the linker; whereas for KIF17, the module (PDZ) is in the linker and the motif in the kinesin.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Domain organization of kinesin I and KIF1A. For kinesin I, its heavy and light polypeptide chains are shown in red and green, respectively. Amino-acid residues in parentheses are referenced to the mouse ubiquitous isoform. Cargo-binding domains (CBD) are indicated by black on white labels; domains involved in regulation of motor activity are indicated by black on white labels. KIF1A, like other KIF1 kinesins, have much shorter coiled-coil regions than kinesin I, and these promote dimerization of KIF1 polypeptides that are brought into close proximity on the cargo surface (Klopfenstein et al., 2002Go; Tomishige et al., 2002Go). Thus, KIF1 polypeptides are monomers in the cytosol (Nangaku et al., 1994Go; Okada et al., 1995Go), and through dimerization, presumably on the cargo surface, acquire the ability to walk along microtubules processively, like native kinesin I does (Tomishige et al., 2002Go). It is appealing to consider that dimerization regulates motor activity of KIF1 kinesins like folding regulates kinesin I activity (see text). The function of the FHA domain, which marks all KIF1 family members, is unknown, but may be involved in regulating dimerization. Liprin and MAGUK cargo-binding domains (LBD and MBS) overlap. The pleckstrin homology domain (PH) is probably a separate cargo-binding domain (Klopfenstein et al., 2002Go). The amino-acid residues in parentheses are referenced to the mouse isoform of KIF1A.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Auto-inhibition of kinesin I motor activity by folding. In the absence of cargo, kinesin I is in a folded conformation wherein the C-terminus of KHC interacts with the motor domain to prevent binding to the microtubule. How kinesin I is activated is unknown. One hypothesis is that cargo binding (to either the KLC or the KHC cargo binding sites) induces a conformational change that frees the motor domain to engage the microtubule.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003