spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 20 May 2003
doi: 10.1242/jcs.00467


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martinez-Arca, S.
Right arrow Articles by Galli, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martinez-Arca, S.
Right arrow Articles by Galli, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ectopic expression of syntaxin 1 in the ER redirects TI-VAMP- and cellubrevin-containing vesicles

Sonia Martinez-Arca1, Véronique Proux-Gillardeaux1, Philipp Alberts1, Daniel Louvard2 and Thierry Galli1,*

1 Membrane Traffic and Neuronal Plasticity, INSERM U536, Institut du Fer-à-Moulin, 75005 Paris, France
2 Morphogenesis and Cell Signaling, CNRS UMR 144, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France



View larger version (72K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Cognate v-SNAREs were mistargeted in HeLa cells expressing syntaxin 1. (A) HeLa cells transfected with syntaxin 1 were fixed and double stained for syntaxin 1 and for the endogenous ER marker calreticulin. Insets show confocal images acquired at high magnification of a syntaxin-1-expressing cell. Note the colocalization between syntaxin 1 and calreticulin. (B,C) HeLa cells transfected with syntaxin 1 or co-transfected with syntaxin 1 and nSec1 as indicated were fixed and double stained for syntaxin 1 and endogenous TI-VAMP, cellubrevin (Cb) or endobrevin (Eb). Transfected cells are marked with an asterisk. A non-transfected cell in C (low panel) is indicated with a triangle. Note that TI-VAMP vesicular staining was lost in cells expressing syntaxin 1 alone but not in those co-expressing syntaxin 1 and nSec1. In syntaxin-1-expressing cells the perinuclear enrichment characteristic of cellubrevin (arrows) was also lost. By contrast, endobrevin vesicular staining was unaffected. Bar, 6 µm. Bar in the inset, 2.5 µm.

 


View larger version (133K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. SNAP-23 was redistributed to the ER in cells expressing syntaxin 1. HeLa cells transfected with syntaxin 1 or co-transfected with syntaxin 1 and nSec1 as indicated were fixed and double stained for syntaxin 1 and endogenous SNAP-23 (A) or the plasma membrane marker Na+/K+ ATPase (B). Note the colocalization of SNAP-23 and ectopic syntaxin 1 (arrowhead) and the absence of SNAP-23 from the plasma membrane in cells expressing syntaxin 1 alone and the plasma membrane staining of SNAP-23 in non-transfected cells or in cells co-transfected with syntaxin 1 plus nSec1 (arrows). By contrast, endogenous Na+/K+ ATPase is not relocalized from the plasma membrane in syntaxin-1-expressing cells. Bar, 7 µm.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Ectopic expression of syntaxin 1 did not affect transferrin recycling. HeLa cells were transfected with syntaxin 1 (upper panels) or co-transfected with syntaxin 1 and nSec1 (lower panels). 24 hours later cells were allowed to internalize transferrin for 1 hour at 37°C, washed and either fixed immediately (uptake) or incubated for a further 1 hour at 37°C before fixation (release). Notice that both the uptake and the release of transferrin were comparable in both kinds of transfected cells and indistinguishable from non-transfected cells, independently of the intracellular distribution of syntaxin 1. Bar, 5 µm.

 


View larger version (71K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Ectopic expression of syntaxin 1 altered the distribution and trafficking of TI-VAMP vesicles' cargo CD63. (A) (Upper panels) Non-transfected HeLa cells double stained for endogenous TI-VAMP and CD63. (Lower panels) HeLa cells transfected with syntaxin 1 were fixed and stained for syntaxin 1 and CD63 24 hours after transfection. Note the almost complete colocalization between TI-VAMP and CD63 in non-transfected cells. In cells transfected with syntaxin 1 (asterisk) the CD63 typical punctate staining was lost and instead the nuclear envelope (arrow) was labeled. Insets show confocal images acquired at high magnification of a syntaxin-1-expressing cell. (B) HeLa cells transfected with syntaxin 1 or with syntaxin 1 plus nSec1 were incubated for 1 hour at 4°C with anti-CD63 antibodies prior to fixation and processing for immunofluorescence with anti-syntaxin 1 antibodies. Note the plasma membrane binding of the anti-CD63 antibody in cells co-transfected with syntaxin 1 plus nSec1, which is indistinguishable from non-transfected cells. By contrast, cells expressing and retaining syntaxin 1 in the ER did not bind to anti-CD63 antibodies. Bar, 6 µm. Bar in the inset, 2 µm.

 


View larger version (119K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Colocalization of GFP-TIVAMP and GFP-cellubrevin but not of GFP-endobrevin with syntaxin 1 in the ER of syntaxin-1-expressing cells. MDCK cells stably expressing GFP-TIVAMP, GFP-cellubrevin (GFP-Cb) or GFP-endobrevin (GFP-Eb) were fixed 24 hours after transfection with syntaxin 1. Cells were stained for syntaxin 1 (red) and calreticulin (blue). Insets show confocal images acquired at high magnification of the same transfected cells shown in the lower magnification panels. GFP-TIVAMP and GFP-Cb lost their characteristic vesicular pattern and instead colocalized with calreticulin in syntaxin-1-expressing cells, as shown by the triple colocalization in the merge panels (light pink). GFP-Eb pattern was not affected by syntaxin 1 expression, as indicated by the colocalization of syntaxin 1 and calreticulin in syntaxin-1-expressing MDCK cells, but not of GFP-Eb, in the merge panel (magenta/purple). Bar in low magnification panels, 7 µm; bar in high magnification insets, 4 µm.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. TI-VAMP and cellubrevin interacted specifically in the ER with ectopic syntaxin 1. (A) HeLa cells were either co-transfected with GFP-Cb and Stx1 (1), or transfected with each cDNA alone (2,3), as indicated. 24 hours after transfection, cells were lysed and the extract from co-transfected cells was immediately immunoprecipitated (1), whereas extracts from cells transfected with only GFP-Cb or Stx1 were mixed and then immunoprecipitated (2+3) with the antibodies indicated. (B) HeLa cells were transfected with syntaxin 1 (1) or co-transfected with syntaxin 1 and nSec1 (2). 24 hours after transfection, cells were lysed and processed for immunoprecipitation with either anti-syntaxin 1 mouse monoclonal antibody (1 and 2) or with control mouse immunoglobulins (1C and 2C). Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and western blots were probed with the antibodies indicated. Note that cellubrevin, SNAP-23 and TI-VAMP but not VAMP4, endobrevin or Vti1b were recovered in the syntaxin 1 immunoprecipitate. SM, starting material.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Inhibition of TIVAMP-GFP and Cb-GFP transport to the plasma membrane in cells expressing syntaxin 1. HeLa cells were transfected with either TIVAMP-GFP or Cb-GFP alone (upper panels) or co-transfected with syntaxin 1 (lower panels), as indicated. 24 hours after transfection cells were incubated with anti-GFP antibodies for 1 hour at 37°C and processed for immunofluorescence. Note that when expressed alone, TIVAMP-GFP and Cb-GFP displayed their typical staining patterns and efficiently took up the anti-GFP antibody from the medium. However, when co-expressed together with syntaxin 1, TIVAMP-GFP and Cb-GFP were both retained in the ER and their expression at the plasma membrane and endocytosis was inhibited. Bar, 6 µm.

 


View larger version (72K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. TI-VAMP relocalization in syntaxin-1-expressing cells was microtubule dependent. (A) MDCK cells stably expressing GFP-TIVAMP incubated with or without 5 µM nocodazole for 1 hour were fixed and stained for {alpha}-tubulin. Note that in the presence of nocodazol, microtubules were completely disrupted. (B) MDCK cells stably expressing GFP-TIVAMP incubated with or without 5 µM nocodazole for 1 hour prior to transfection with syntaxin 1 were fixed and stained for syntaxin 1 8 hours after transfection. In control conditions (Cont), the expression of syntaxin 1 and its retention in the ER induced a relocalization of GFP-TIVAMP towards syntaxin-1-positives structures in the ER (arrows). By contrast, in the absence of functional microtubules (+Noc) the localization of GFP-TIVAMP in transfected cells was indistinguishable from non-transfected cells. Bar, 4 µm.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003