
View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. BK promotes internalization of plasmalemmal eNOS. (A) Subcellular
localization of eNOS was assessed by laser scanning confocal microscopy in
live eNOS-GFP ECV304 cells, cultured on coverslips. Coverslips were
transferred to a Zeiss temperature controlled perfusion system mounted on the
microscope stage. (Top panel; BK-), eNOS-GFP was most prominent in plasma
membrane and perinuclear regions of the cell, and its distribution was not
influenced in the absence of BK during the 12 minutes of the experiment
(arrows denote plasmalemmal eNOS). The graph accompanying the top panel
quantifies the fluorescence intensity in plasma membrane (PM: solid line with
diamonds) and perinuclear region (non-PM: dashed line with squares) in the
sequential micrographic images. (Bottom panel; BK+), stimulation of cells with
BK (10 µM) triggered a reduction in fluorescence intensity of eNOS-GFP from
the plasma membrane (arrows denote distribution of plasmalemmal eNOS). The
graph accompanying the bottom panel quantifies a decrease in fluorescence in
PM (solid line with diamonds), but not in the perinuclear, non-PM areas
(dashed line with squares). The displayed images are representative of 7
independent experiments, and the graphs were generated by compiling the data
from 3 cells from each group (mean±s.e.m.). (B) Influence of BK on the
distribution of Na+-K+ ATPase and eNOS-GFP was assessed
by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy in fixed ECV304 cells. In the
absence of BK stimulation, substantive pools of Na+-K+
ATPase (top left panel) and eNOS-GFP (top middle panel, arrows denote
plasmalemmal eNOS) are detected in the cell periphery, and colocalization of
discrete pools of the proteins is detected in portions of the cell periphery
(top right panel, arrows denote colocalization in yellow). After BK
stimulation, Na+-K+ ATPase remains in a plasmalemmal
distribution (bottom left panel), while substantive pools of eNOS-GFP
dissociate from the plasma membrane (bottom middle panel, arrows denote lack
of eNOS in plasma membrane) as further evidenced by lack of colocalization
with plasmalemmel Na+-K+ ATPase (lower right). (C)
Influence of BK on the distribution of eNOS-GFP in comparison to Golgi 58K
protein was assessed by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy in fixed ECV304
cells. In the absence of BK stimulation, substantive pools of 58K protein
reside in a perinuclear distribution (top left panel) and pools of eNOS-GFP
also reside in a perinuclear distribution (top middle panel, denoted by
arrows). Colocalization of the two proteins is detected in a perinuclear Golgi
pattern (top right panel, yellow). After BK stimulation of cells, 58K protein
remains in a perinuclear distribution (bottom left panel), and the pool of
perinuclear eNOS-GFP remains in a similar distribution (bottom middle panel),
as further evidenced by maintenance of colocalization of the two proteins in a
perinuclear distribution (lower right panel, colocalization denoted in
yellow).
|