spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 11 March 2003
doi: 10.1242/jcs.00311


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uzbekov, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kireev, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uzbekov, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kireev, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Nucleolar association of pEg7 and XCAP-E, two members of Xenopus laevis condensin complex in interphase cells

Rustem Uzbekov1,2, Elmira Timirbulatova2, Erwan Watrin1, Fabien Cubizolles1, David Ogereau1, Pavel Gulak3, Vincent Legagneux1, Vladimir Ju. Polyakov4, Katherine Le Guellec1,* and Igor Kireev2,5,{ddagger}

1 Groupe Structure Dynamique de la Chromatine, CNRS, UMR 6061, Faculte de Medicine, 35043, Rennes, France
2 Cell Cycle Group, Division of Electron Microscopy, A. N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, 119899, Moscow, Russia
3 Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, 127550 Moscow, Russia
4 Division of Electron Microscopy, A. N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, 119899, Moscow, Russia
5 Department of Cell and Structural Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana 61801, USA



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Specificity of antibodies to Eg7G, XCAP-E1, TopoII and ß-tubulin in XL2 cell extract. Proteins in X. laevis XL2 cell lysate (2x105 cells) were separated onto 7% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes and immunodetected with mixture of purified Eg7G and monoclonal antibodies against ß-tubulin (lane1) or XCAP-E1 antibodies (lane 2) or monoclonal anti-topoII antibodies (lane 3).

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Western blot analysis of the quantity of pEg7, topoII and XCAP-E in the synchronized cells of different stages of cell cycle. (A) After electrophoresis and transfer onto nitrocellulose, the membrane was cut, the upper part was incubated with antibodies to topoII, the second part with a mixture of pEg7 and the third part with monoclonal antibodies against ß-tubulin and the last part with monoclonal antibodies against pEg2 (clone 1C1). Immunocomplexes were revealed using an enhanced chemoluminescence system. (B) Relative quantities of protein during the cell cycle (protein:ß-tubulin ratio, with the ratio in G1 equal to 1). The level of cycle-dependent protein kinase pEg2 increased from 1 at G1 to 15.44±3.21 at M phase; the quantity of topoII was maximal in G2 phase (3.61±1.22) and practically the same in mitosis (3.52±1.04). The quantity of pEg7 and XCAP-E increased from 1 at G1 to 1.48±0.09 and 1.48±0.04 times at M phase, respectively. Average data from four measurements from two experiments are presented. Quantitative analysis was performed using Image Quant computer program.

 


View larger version (170K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Nucleolar localization of XCAPE and topoII in an interphase nucleus. XL-2 cells were grown and fixed as described in Materials and Methods. Cell were then processed for double immunofluorescence staining (A-E) with anti-XCAP-E affinity-purified polyclonal antibody (C) and anti-human topoII monoclonal antibody (D). Double staining is shown in e. Cells were observed by phase contrast microscopy (A) and stained with DAPI (B). For electron microscopy (F-H), cells were fixed as described under Materials and Methods and then labeled for double immunogold electron microscopy with an anti-XCAP-E affinity-purified polyclonal antibody and an anti-human topoII monoclonal antibody. Anti-XCAP-E and anti-topoII antibodies were revealed with a secondary anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to 5 nm gold particle (for XCAP-E) and an anti-mouse antibody conjugated to a 10 nm gold particles (for topoII, arrows), respectively. Bar, 5 µm (A-E), 1 µm (F) and 0.2 µm (G,H).

 


View larger version (148K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Nucleolar localization of pEg7 and topoII in the interphase nucleus. XL-2 cells were grown and fixed as described under Materials and Methods. Cell were then processed for double immunofluorescence staining (panels A-E) with an anti-pEg7G affinity-purified polyclonal antibody (C) and an anti-human topoII monoclonal antibody (D). The merged picture is shown in e. Cells were observed by phase contrast microscopy (A) and stained with DAPI (B). For electron microscopy (F-H) cell were fixed as described under Materials and Methods and then labeled for double immunogold electron microscopy with anti-pEg7G affinity-purified polyclonal antibody and anti-human topoII monoclonal antibody. Anti-Eg7 and anti-topoII antibodies were revealed with a secondary anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to a 5 nm gold particle (for pEg7) and an anti-mouse antibody conjugated to 10 nm gold particle (for topoII, arrows), respectively. Bar, 5 µm (A-E), 1 µm (F) and 0.2 µm (G,H).

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Immunolocalization of XCAP-E and UBF in control cells and after actinomycin treatment. XL2 cells were incubated for 6 hours in the medium with 5 µg/ml actinomycin D (E-H) or without the drug (A-D). After fixation, cells were processed for immunofluorescence staining with polyclonal anti-XCAP-E1 antibodies (B,F) and human autoimmune serum to UBF (C,G). Cells were stained with DAPI for DNA visualization (A,E). Triple DAPI/XCAP-E/UBF labeling is shown (D,H). Bar, 5 µm.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Immunolocalization of XCAP-E and fibrillarin in control cells and after actinomycin treatment. XL2 cells were incubated for 6 hours in the medium with 5 µg/ml actinomycin D (E,H) or without the drug (A-D). After fixation, cells were processed for immunofluorescence staining with polyclonal anti-XCAP-E1 antibodies (B,F) and human autoimmune serum to fibrillarin (C,G). Cells were stained for DNA visualization with DAPI (A,E). Triple DAPI/XCAP-E/fibrillarin labeling is shown (D,H). Bar, 5 µm.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Immunolocalization of XCAP-E and B23 in control cells and after actinomycin treatment. XL2 cells were incubated for 6 hours in the medium with 5 µg/ml actinomycin D (E-H) or without the drug (A-D). After fixation, cells were processed for immunofluorescence staining with polyclonal anti-XCAP-E1 (B,F) and monoclonal anti-B23 (C,G) antibodies. Cells were stained for DNA visualization with DAPI (A,E). Triple DAPI/XCAP-E/B23 labeling is shown (D,H). Bar, 5 µm.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Immunolocalization of pEg7 and topoII on the nucleolus in control cells and after actinomycin treatment. XL2 cells were incubated for 6 hours in the medium with 5 µg/ml actinomycin D (E-H) or without the drug (A-D). After fixation cells were processed for immunofluorescence staining with polyclonal anti-pEg7 (C,G) and monoclonal anti-topoII (D,H) antibodies. Cells were observed by phase contrast microscopy (A,E) and stained for DNA visualization with DAPI (B,F). Bar, 5 µm.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Immunolocalization of XCAP-E and topoII on the nucleolus in control cells and after actinomycin treatment. XL2 cells were incubated for 6 hours in the medium with 5 µg/ml actinomycin D (E-H) or without the drug (A-D). After fixation, cells were processed for immunofluorescence staining with polyclonal anti-XCAP-E1 (C,G) and monoclonal anti-topoII (D,H) antibodies. Cells were observed by phase contrast microscopy (A,E) and stained for DNA visualization with DAPI (B,F). Bar, 5 µm.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003