spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 16, 2004
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.01059


Journal of Cell Science 117, 2109-2120 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snee, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snee, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Live imaging of nuage and polar granules: evidence against a precursor-product relationship and a novel role for Oskar in stabilization of polar granule components

Mark J. Snee and Paul M. Macdonald*

Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Section of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA



View larger version (170K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Nuage clusters are stable. Panels A-D show VasGFP in the same live-egg chamber at 0, 4, 8 and 12 minutes after the start of imaging. Arrowheads indicate nuage clusters that are stable over this time period. Arrows indicate a nuage cluster that appears to detach from the nuclear envelope and move freely in the nurse cell cytoplasm. Note that this detachment was a very rare event. The sampling rate for this experiment was one scan every 2 minutes, and was 1-2 scans/minute for others. To address the possibility that some clusters are rapidly lost, followed by rapid reassembly of novel clusters at the same positions, some experiments were performed with sampling rates of up to 73 scans/minute, and the clusters appeared stable over 61 frames. Scale bars, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (168K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Nuage clusters are stable yet exchange components with cytoplasmic pools. Panels A-C show VasGFP fluorescence in the same region of a stage-8 egg chamber at different phases of a FRAP experiment. (A) The initial distribution of nuclear envelope-attached nuage clusters; (B) immediately after photobleaching; (C) after 10 minutes recovery. (D) is an overlay of panels A (red) and C (green) that reveals the rapid recovery of fluorescence in stable nuage clusters (arrows). Scale bars, 4 µm.

 


View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Nuage particle movement in nurse cells. All panels show GFPAub except E, where ExuGFP particles are detected. The dashed lines in B, C, F, and G delineate the oocyte-nurse cell boundaries. (A) Representative movements of GFPAub particles in a nurse cell of a stage-9 egg chamber. A time projection of ten images (each taken 6 seconds apart) is shown, with the arrows aligned next to moving particles to indicate the direction and distance of migration. A ring canal connecting to the oocyte is out of the field to the top right of the image. (B) Nuage particles concentrated near the ring canals of a stage-9 egg chamber. The ring canals (rc; large gaps in dashed line) connect the nurse cells to the oocyte. The particle movements in this field are shown in the time projection in C, which represents 15 images captured at 6 second intervals. The small arrows indicate particles that are traversing the ring canals into the oocyte, the arrowheads indicate relatively immobile particles near the ring canals, and the large arrows indicate rapidly moving particles in other cytoplasmic regions. (D) Exclusion of GFPAub from regions of the cytoplasm. Structures appearing circular in cross section lack cytoplasmic GFPAub (arrows) and are sometimes clustered near ring canals along with nuage particles (arrowheads). (E) Clustering of relatively immobile ExuGFP structures near ring canals. This field was imaged for 10 minutes and showed very little movement of the particles (data not shown). (F,G) Onset of nurse-cell to oocyte transport at stage 8. For the stage-8 egg chamber in F, a much smaller data set was collected by imaging a single focal plane at one-minute intervals for four repetitions. In this and other experiments, particles were easily detected in passage through ring canals (arrow). For the stage-7 egg chamber in G, a large fraction of all possible particle movements were tracked by imaging at multiple focal planes and repeating the imaging at one-minute intervals for 20 repetitions. The data are presented as a z-series and time projection, and reveal no transport of particles into the oocyte. Scale bars, 5 µm (A,D), 8 µm (C), 10 µm (B,F,G), and 20 µm (E).

 


View larger version (120K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Bruno is a nuage component. Immunostaining shows (A,E) Bru protein, (B,F) GFPAub and (D) BruGFP. (C) Bru staining in red and GFPAub in green. Bru protein can be found partially concentrated in particles around the nucleus (A, and red in C), where it colocalizes with GFPAub (B, and green in C). The colocalization of these molecules is not complete, suggesting some heterogeneity in the nuage. BruGFP is also found in these foci (D). This concentration is largely abolished in vasAS/vasAS nurse cells (E). Nuage, visualized with GFPAub, does not appear disrupted in aretQB/aretQB pseudo-egg chambers (F), or in the nurse cells of the weaker allelic combination of aretPA/aretPD (data not shown). Scale bars, 10 µm (A-D and F), 20 µm (E).

 


View larger version (100K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Nuage clusters and particles in mutants. (A,C,E) Immunostaining of VasGFP. (B,D,F-H) Immunostaining of GFPAub. In wild-type nurse cells the pattern of VasGFP (A) and GFPAub (B) includes perinuclear nuage clusters (arrows) and cytoplasmic particles (arrowheads). Perinuclear nuage appears smoother in aubHN2/aubQC42 than in wild type, but nuage particles are unaffected (C). Very few nuage clusters and particles remain in vasAS/vasAS nurse cells (D). In the spnEE616/spnE3987 mutant nuage particles are lost and the perinuclear nuage is smoother (E). Nuage clusters and particles appear wild type in tudor1-mutant nurse cells (F). Nuage in wild-type spermatocytes is readily detectable using GFPAub (G), and is completely disrupted in vasAS males (H). Scale bars, 1 µm (G,H), 5 µm (A,D), 10 µm (B,C,E,F).

 


View larger version (116K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Nuage-particle movements in the oocyte. (A) To track oocyte-particle movements, GFPAub was imaged in a live stage-8/9 egg chamber for 60 minutes ({Delta}t=1 minute) in multiple z-planes, with the data shown as a combined z-axis and time series projection. The arrows are positioned next to a subset of the moving particles and show the direction and path of movements. (B-D) GFPAub in different regions of a single egg chamber, images were taken from a series of scans performed at one-minute intervals. B and C are the first and last scans of the series and show that the movement of nuage particles follow general cytoplasmic movements. The arrows show the direction of and the distance covered by a nuage particle (small arrow) and a yolk platelet/vesicle (large arrow) in this time interval. The yolk platelet/vesicles (which appear black because they lack cytoplasmic GFPAub fluorescence) provide a simple means of tracking general cytoplasmic movements. D shows that particle movements near the posterior pole of the oocyte particle movements are restricted. The arrow shows the rapid movement of a nuage particle at the anterior (the same particle whose movement is shown by the small arrows in B and C), whereas a particle close to the posterior (arrowhead) is relatively immobile. These results are typical of those obtained in multiple additional experiments. The dashed line in A delineates the oocyte nurse-cell boundary. Scale bars, 7 µm (B-D) and 10 µm (A).

 


View larger version (114K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Incorporation of cytoplasmic GFPAub into polar granules. GFPAub fluorescence in polar granules and in the cytoplasm was monitored before (A), immediately after (B), and 10 minutes after (C) photobleaching. (D) is a projection of 11 images ({Delta}t=1 minute) that follow the recovery of GFPAub at the posterior. Large nuage particles were not detected to arrive at the posterior and could therefore not account for the recovery of fluorescence (D). The white box indicates the region of photobleaching. Scale bars, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (104K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Oskar nucleates the formation of exogenous GFPAub particles in the early oocyte. Osk protein in wild-type egg chambers (A) and in flies expressing osk-bcd3'UTR (B). Arrows in B indicate ectopic Osk protein expressed from the osk-bcd 3'UTR transgene, arrows in A show wild-type oocytes with no Osk staining (the follicle cell staining is non-specific). (C-F) GFPAub fluorescence in wild-type (C) and osk-bcd 3'UTR flies (D-F). Wild-type oocytes contain very few GFPAub particles (arrow in C), but those with the osk-bcd 3' UTR transgene have abundant particulate GFPAub fluorescence (arrows in D,E), as well as a significantly enhanced level of cytoplasmic GFPAub. The image in F is a combined z-axis and time projection of a live stage-7 osk-bcd 3' UTR egg chamber that has been imaged at 70-seconds intervals for 14 frames, showing that very few nuage particles can be tracked entering the early oocyte, just as in wild type. Dashed lines in C, D, and F delineate the oocyte-nurse cell boundaries. Scale bars, 5 µm (E), 15 µm (D,F), 17 µm (B), 20 µm (C) and 23 µm (A).

 


View larger version (113K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Oskar protein promotes ectopic particle formation in nurse cells. Osk protein in wild-type (A) and UASosk egg chambers (B). Ectopic Osk protein is present at the cortex of oocytes and in nurse cells of UASosk egg chambers. (C,D) Distribution of GFPAub in UASosk egg chambers. Clumps of GFPAub particles are often found in the nurse cells of these egg chambers (arrows in C,D), and the level of GFPAub fluorescence is often enhanced. (E-G) The extent of colocalization of GFPAub and Osk was monitored by double labeling of UASosk egg chambers. Osk (G) and GFPAub (F) are merged in E, with Osk in red and GFPAub in green. The clumps of GFPAub particles colocalize with regions of concentrated Osk protein (arrows in E-G). Most particles in these clumps contain GFPAub and Osk (yellow particles in E, short arrows in E-G), some particles contain mostly Osk protein (red particles in E), others only contain GFPAub (long arrows in E-G), particularly those attached to the nuclear envelope (arrowheads in E-G). Osk protein was distributed throughout the nurse cells, but was not found to be strongly associated with the nurse-cell cortex, in contrast to the strong cortical association within the oocyte (B,G). Scale bars are 10 µm (D-G), 20 µm (C) and 100 µm (A,B).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004