QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online May 24, 2004
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.01088

This Article Summary Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Figure Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hanley, W. D. Articles by Konstantopoulos, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hanley, W. D. Articles by Konstantopoulos, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Distinct kinetic and mechanical properties govern selectin-leukocyte interactions

¹ Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
² Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

View larger version (30K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. (A) Structural diagrams representing P-, E- and L-selectin. The selectins are rigid, asymmetric molecules that share structural similarities including the presence of the C-type lectin domain, followed by an epidermal-growth-factor-like (EGF) motif, a variable series of short consensus repeats (nine, six and two for P-, E- and L-selectins, respectively), a transmembrane domain (TM) and a cytoplasmic tail (cyto). There is also a high degree of homology between the three proteins within each region. (B) Selectin-mediated leukocyte recruitment. PSGL-1 on free-flowing leukocytes tethers to E- and/or P-selectin on activated endothelial cells, allowing leukocytes to roll to sites of infection or inflammation. E-Selectin might also bind to an as-yet-unidentified leukocyte glycosphingolipid. PSGL-1 on adherent leukocytes participates in secondary tethering by interacting with L-selectin on free-flowing leukocytes.

View larger version (16K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Force versus time traces for E-selectin binding to PMNs in the absence (A) and presence (B) of EDTA. Experimental conditions, including selectin concentration on the cantilever, contact force and dwell time, were optimized for both E-selectin and L-selectin experiments to result in 30% binding events (30 adhesion events per 100 contacts). The arrows indicate rupture events with magnitudes of about 100 pN taken from an experiment with a reproach velocity of 15 µm second–1. The presence of EDTA was consistently found to eliminate receptor-ligand binding. The linear increase in slope just before each rupture event is indicative of the loading rate exerted on the receptor-ligand bond (Benoit et al., 2000; Li et al., 2003; Wojcikiewicz et al., 2003).

View larger version (31K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Frequency of binding events for control and specificity experiments for L-selectin (A) and E-selectin (B). The presence of EDTA was found to abrogate binding. The presence of blocking antibodies for L-selectin (LAM1-116), E-selectin (ENA2) and PSGL-1 (KPL-1) dramatically reduced the frequency of binding. (C) Reduction in frequency of selectin binding to PMNs treated with OSGE. Reductions in the frequencies indicate that heavily O-linked glycoproteins are crucial for L- and P-selectin binding, and play a predominant role in E-selectin binding to PMNs. (D) Rupture-force histograms for E-selectin binding to control PMNs and OSGE-treated PMNs at a reproach velocity of 10 µm second–1. E-selectin binding to OSGE-treated PMNs resulted in a lower frequency of rupture events with a lower overall magnitude. As a result of the lower binding frequency, the area under the force histogram for OSGE-treated PMNs is about 40% that of the control. The less rigorous requirements for E-selectin binding might allow it to bind more easily to other glycosylated ligands (N-linked glycoproteins or glycosphingolipids) previously shielded by the heavily O-linked glycoproteins.

View larger version (18K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Representative force histogram and Monte Carlo simulations for L-selectin (A) and E-selectin (B) binding to human PMNs at a reproach velocity of 10 µm second–1. Simulations were conducted using the Bell model parameters extracted from the non-linear estimation and yielded most frequent and mean rupture forces in accord with those observed experimentally. The area under the force histograms represents the proportion of successful binding events (30% in these cases).

View larger version (25K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Rupture force plotted against the natural logarithm of loading rate for E-, P- and L-selectin binding to PMNs. Data comprise at least eight independent experiments and a range of reproach velocities for each selectin, conducted on separate days to validate reproducibility. Each force spectrum represents at least 2000 successful events. The superimposed solid lines indicate the non-linear least-squares fit over the entire range of experimental loading rates, found from the probability density function for bond rupture and corresponding Bell model parameters.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

Twitter