spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 2 December 2003
doi: 10.1242/jcs.00857


Journal of Cell Science 117, 257-270 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gavard, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mège, R.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gavard, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mège, R.-M.

Lamellipodium extension and cadherin adhesion: two cell responses to cadherin activation relying on distinct signalling pathways

Julie Gavard1, Mireille Lambert1, Inna Grosheva2, Véronique Marthiens1, Theano Irinopoulou1, Jean-François Riou3, Alexander Bershadsky2 and René-Marc Mège1,*

1 Signalisation et Différenciation Cellulaires dans les Systèmes Nerveux et Musculaire, U440 INSERM - UPMC, Institut du Fer à Moulin, 17 rue du Fer à Moulin, 75005 Paris, France
2 Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, PO Box 26, Rehovot 76100, Israel
3 Equipe Biologie Expérimentale, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement, UMR 7622 CNRS - UPMC, 9 quai Saint-Bernard, 75005 Paris, France



View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. N-cadherin adhesion, typical cell spreading and cytoskeleton organization on the Ncad-Fc substrate. (A) Myogenic mouse C2 cells expressing endogenous N-cadherin were spread on laminin (/Laminin), stained for ß-catenin and analysed by confocal microscopy. Alternatively, actin-GFP-transfected cells were spread on laminin and analysed by confocal microscopy in combination with differential interference contrast (DIC) imaging. Note the radial distribution of ß-catenin and the more complex actin network (circles) at cell-cell contacts. (B) C2 cells dissociated in trypsin-free conditions were seeded in serum-free medium on silanized glass coverslips coated by immunoadsorption with purified Ncad-Fc (/Ncad-Fc). Cells spread for 2 hours exhibited typical fried egg morphology (DIC). Cytoskeleton organization was assessed by labelling actin filaments with phalloidin and microtubules with anti-tubulin antibodies. Bar, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (90K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Cell spreading on Ncad-Fc induces the formation of cadherin adhesions. (A) C2 cells spread for 2 hours on Ncad-Fc were immunolabelled for ß-catenin, {alpha}-catenin and p120 or directly observed for the localization of transfected N-cadherin-GFP. The three catenins as well as N-cadherin presented the same radial distribution in the lamellipodium. The radial distribution of ß-catenin was specifically detected on a 500 nm thin confocal section taken at the ventral side of fried-egg-shaped cells (confocal). The strong vesicle-like immunostaining in the central area of the cells was not detected in this section. (B) Double staining for ß-catenin (red) and F-actin (green) was performed on cells spread on Ncad-Fc and analysed by confocal microscopy. (C) Co-localization of the red (ß-catenin) and green (F-actin) signals was analysed along the line indicated on the overlay image by line scan (Metamorph software). An optical section taken close to the cell-substratum interface revealed a zone of coincidence of ß-catenin-positive structures and F-actin labelling within the lamellipodium. Bars, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Laminin or anti-N-cadherin antibodies failed to induce cadherin adhesions. (A) C2 cells were seeded on laminin (/Laminin) or anti-N-cadherin antibodies (/Anti-Ncad) and immunostained for ß-catenin or F-actin. The usual elongated shape of C2 cells grown on laminin was also observed on the anti-N-cadherin substrate. In both conditions, ß-catenin immunostaining was uniformly distributed at the cell surface and no radial distribution of ß-catenin and actin fibres was detected. Bar, 10 µm. (B) Quantitative analysis of cell shape achieved after 2 hours of spreading on the Ncad-Fc, laminin, anti-N-cad and poly-ornithine (PO) substrates; the number of counted cells was superior to 250 for each condition and repeated in three independent experiments. (C) Quantification of mouse C2 cells or S180 chicken N-cad cells forming cadherin adhesions when seeded on Ncad-Fc, polyclonal anti-mouse N-cadherin serum, laminin or monoclonal GC4 anti-chicken N-cadherin antibody, respectively (at least 250 cells counted in two independent experiments).

 


View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Rac1 and PI 3-kinase are differentially involved in cell spreading and cadherin adhesion formation. (A) C2 cells transiently transfected with GFP-tagged DA (V12) or DN (N17) forms of Rac1 were plated for 2 hours on Ncad-Fc (/Ncad-Fc), fixed and stained for ß-catenin. (B) DA Rac1-transfected cells were seeded on anti-N-cadherin antibodies (/Anti-Ncad) and stained for ß-catenin. (C) Cells were treated with wortmannin (Wort, 50 nM) before plating for 2 hours on Ncad-Fc and labelled for ß-catenin. Alternatively, the same experiment was performed with DA Rac1-transfected cells. Bars, 10 µm. (D,E) The histograms present the quantification of cell spreading and cadherin adhesions in the various conditions, expressed as a percent of the control conditions. At least 300 cells were counted in three independent experiments (except two for the cdc42 mutants).

 


View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. p120 is necessary for both cell spreading on Ncad-Fc substrate and cadherin adhesion formation. (A) C2 cells were transfected either with siRNA p120-pSUPER or the empty pSUPER vectors, 16 hours prior to protein extraction. Twenty µg of protein extracts were separated on 7% SDS-PAGE and analysed by immunoblotting with anti-p120 and anti-ß-catenin antibodies. Tubulin was used as a loading control. (B) p120-pSUPER-transfected cells and mock transfectants were fixed and immunostained for p120 and ß-catenin. Note the very low level of p120 immunostaining in p120-pSUPER-transfected cells and the remaining accumulation of ß-catenin at cell-cell contacts (arrows). (C) C2 cells double transfected with pEGFP and either p120-pSUPER or empty-pSUPER were plated on Ncad-Fc substrate for 2 hours and labelled with anti-ß-catenin antibodies or Alexa-conjugated phalloidin. Note the absence of spreading of p120-pSUPER-transfected cells, contrasting with the normal spreading and cadherin adhesion formation of mock transfected cells. (D) C2 cells double transfected with the p120-pSUPER and DA Rac1-GFP were plated on Ncad-Fc and stained for ß-catenin or actin. Notice the restored spreading of the cells. Bars, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The expression of p120 in epithelial SW48 cells is sufficient to induce cell spreading on hEcad-Fc and cadherin adhesions. (A) E-cadherin-expressing SW48 cells grown in standard conditions and immunostained for p120 and ß-catenin. (B) Equal quantities (10 µg) of proteins extracted from SW48 cells transfected with GFP (lane 1) or p120-GFP (lane 2) were separated on 7% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-p120, anti-GFP, anti-ß-catenin antibodies, then with anti-tubulin antibodies as a loading control. (C) GFP- and p120-GFP-expressing SW48 cells were plated on hEcad-Fc (/hEcad-Fc) for 2 hours and immunostained for ß-catenin. While GFP-expressing cells behave exactly as GFP-negative cells (top row), p120-GFP SW48 cells spread extensively on the hEcad-Fc substrate (second row). Concomitantly, all these spread cells organized ß-catenin-positive radial structures in their lamellipodium (enlargement, third row). By contrast, p120-transfected SW48 cells did not spread better than untransfected cells on fibronectin (/Fibronectin). Bar, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Cell spreading and cadherin adhesions are inhibited by p120 overexpression in C2 cells. (A) C2 cells expressing p120-GFP alone or together with DA Rac1 were plated on Ncad-Fc for 2 hours before labelling with anti-ß-catenin antibodies. (B) Cells were double transfected with p120-GFP and the Myc-tagged JMD-cad construct, then seeded on Ncad-Fc for 2 hours and labelled with anti-ß-catenin and anti-Myc antibodies. Bar, 10 µm. (C) The histogram presents the quantification of cadherin adhesions in the various conditions, expressed as a percent of the control conditions. At least 200 cells were counted in two independent experiments.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Co-enrichment of p120 and Rac1 in membrane fractions upon JMD-cad expression. C2 cells were transiently transfected with GFP (lane 1), p120-GFP plus JMD-cad (lane 2), JMD-cad (lane 3) or p120-GFP (lane 4), then cultured for 16 hours, harvested and submitted to subcellular fractionation. (A) Membrane-associated and cytosolic proteins (10 µg and 20 µg, respectively) were separated on 7% SDS-PAGE and blotted with anti-p120, anti-ß-catenin antibodies, then with anti-tubulin antibodies as a loading control. The results are representative of two independent experiments. (B) The same extracts were separated on 13% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted against Rac1. (C) The JMD-cad expression induced a threefold increase in Rac1 recovered in membrane fractions. The densitometry analysis was performed with the NIH Image 2.0 software on two independent experiments.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004