spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 12, 2005
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.02387


Journal of Cell Science 118, 2093-2104 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balla, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balla, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Inositol-lipid binding motifs: signal integrators through protein-lipid and protein-protein interactions

Tamas Balla

Endocrinology and Reproduction Research Branch, NICHD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA



View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Similarities and differences between the inositide and peptide binding of PH, PTB, PDZ and FERM domains. (A) Inositide binding of PH domains occurs in a pocket formed by the ß1-ß4 sheets and connecting loops (light blue). Exceptions are the spectrin PH domain, which binds the lipid outside this position, and the Grp1/ARNO PH domain, in which a long insertion (brown) replaces the ß3-ß4 sheets in forming the pocket. The position of Gß{gamma} (gray) bound to the GRK2 PH domain shows that it involves a surface distinct from the putative lipid-binding site (purple arrow). (B) PTB domains often contain a helix inserted between their ß1-ß2 strands (salmon). Inositol lipids bind at the outer surface of this helix (the purple arrow indicates the presumed lipid-binding site of Shc), whereas the peptide always binds between the C-terminal helix and the parallel ß7 strand. (C) The C-subdomain of FERM domains is a PTB fold that binds peptide sequences found within integrin tails. The inositide binding site of radexin is quite far from the inositide-binding site of PH domains, but mutagenesis studies indicate an additional binding site in radexin talin and moesin (purple arrows) that corresponds to the region where PH domains bind inositides. This putative lipid-binding site is masked by the C-terminal tail in the inactive conformation of moesin. (D) The PDZ domain binds its peptide binding-partners at a position similar to that in the PTB domains. The kink in the loop between the ß1 and ß2 strand explains why PDZ domains usually bind C-terminal peptides. The only reported inositide binding of the Syntenin PH domain maps to a surface pointed to by the purple arrow. The PDB accession numbers used were: 1MAI, PLC{theta}1PH (Ferguson et al., 1995Go); 1H10, AktPH (Thomas et al., 2002Go);1BTN, SpectrinPH (Hyvonen et al., 1995Go); 1FHX, Grp1PH (Ferguson et al., 2000Go); 1OMW, GRK2PH (Lodowski et al., 2003Go); 1NU2, Dab1PTB (Stolt et al., 2003Go); 1SHC, ShcPTB (Zhou et al., 1995Go); 1IRS, IRS1PTB (Zhou et al., 1996Go); 1BE9, PSD95PDZ3 (Morais-Cabral et al., 1996Go); 1OBX, SyntheninPDZ2 (Kang et al., 2003Go); 1GC6, Radixin-FERM-InsP3 (Hamada et al., 2000Go); 1J19, Radixin-FERM-ICAM2pept (Hamada et al., 2003Go); 1MK7, Talin-FERM (Garcia-Alvarez et al., 2003Go); 1SGH, Moesin-FERM (Finnerty et al., 2004Go). Pictures were created by Molscript (Kraulis, 1991Go).

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Inositide binding by FYVE and PX domains. (A) The Ins(1,3)P2 (mimicking PtdIns(3)P) binding of the EEA1 FYVE domain occurs in a relatively shallow groove and involves the conserved R(R/K)HHCRxCG sequence. The binding pocket occupies the same position within the Hrs FYVE and Vps27p FYVE domains (red circle labeled 1). A hydrophobic tip facing the membrane is important for membrane penetration (blue arrows). The corresponding area within the PKC{theta} cysteine-rich domain (CRD) recognises the hydrophobic phorbol esters. (B) PX domains bind 3-phosphorylated inositides in the pocket formed by two helices and the loop connecting the ß1 and ß2 strand. An additional binding site that binds PA or other acidic phospholipids is located in the p47phox PX domain (red circle labeled 2). The long coil containing the PxxP consensus sequence (red) in many PX domains (only a single proline in the CISK PX domain) is the site of interaction with the SH3 domain in the p47phox PX domain. The PDB accession numbers used are: 1JOC, EEA1 FYVE (Dumas et al., 2001Go); 1DVP, Hrs FYVE (drosophila) (Mao et al., 2000Go); 1VFY, Vps27p FYVE (Misra and Hurley, 1999Go); 1PTR, PKC{theta} CRD (Zhang et al., 1995Go); 1H6H, p40phox PX (Bravo et al., 2001Go); 1O7K, p47phox PX (Karathanassis et al., 2002Go); 1OCU, Grd19p PX (Zhou et al., 2003Go); 1XTE, CISK PX (Xing et al., 2004Go).

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Inositide and peptide recognition by adaptor proteins. (A) The trunk domain of the tetrameric clathrin adaptor AP-2 binds phosphoinositides in two locations. One of the binding sites is at a peripheral position in the N-terminus of the {alpha}2 subunit (green). The other site (red circle labeled 1) is within the µ2 subunit (brown). Binding of the lipid to this site is believed to be one of the factors inducing a conformational change that allows binding of the internalization motif Yxx{Phi} to µ2 at a site that is otherwise blocked by interaction with the ß2 subunit (gray circle labeled 2). (B) The binding of Ins(1,4,5)P3 [mimicking PtdIns(4,5)P2] to CALM occurs at a helical domain (green) in a similarly peripheral position to that seen in AP-2. By contrast, in the ENTH domain of epsin, an additional helix (helix 0), which is disordered in the structure without the inositide, contributes to the coordination of the lipid headgroup within the multi-helical structure that is otherwise very similar to CALM/ANTH domains. (C) The structure of ß-arrestin-1 resembles that of the C-terminal multi-stranded domain of the AP-2 µ2 subunit. The electropositive groove that interacts with phosphorylated tails of G protein-coupled receptors (gray circle labeled 2) and the adjacent inositide-binding pocket (red circle labeled 1) are very reminiscent of the peptide- and lipid-binding sites of the AP-2 µ2 domain. Gray arrows indicate clathrin- and ß2-adaptin-binding sites. The PDB accession numbers used are: 1GW5, AP-2 core (Collins et al., 2002Go); 1HES, µ2-C-terminal (Owen and Evans, 1998Go); 1H0A, Epsin-ENTH (Ford et al., 2002Go); 1HG2, CALM-ANTH (Ford et al., 2001Go).

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. General principles of regulation by phosphoinositides. (A) Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation cycles control signaling cascades either directly (i) by phosphorylation of proteins, or indirectly (ii) by altering the phosphorylation state of GDP/GTP bound to GTP-binding proteins. Phosphorylation of membrane inositides (iii) offers a unique regulatory feature in that the phosphate acceptor molecule is membrane bound and can be phosphorylated in multiple ways. The phosphorylated lipid species interacts with proteins that recognise the lipid. It thereby contributes to the recruitment of these proteins to the membrane and probably also evokes conformational changes that affect their functions. (B) Phosphoinositides can control several kinds of signaling processes. Many proteins that contain phosphoinositide-recognition domains assume an inactive conformation (Einactive) in the cytosol in which the inositide-binding site is masked by intramolecular or inter-molecular interactions. Production of the appropriate phosphoinositide (PtdIns(x,y)Pn+1) recruits the protein to the membrane, and specificity is imparted through interaction with integral (I) or peripheral (P) membrane proteins. The complex can remain active at the membrane and recruit additional proteins, such as actin or clathrin or, after modification, the protein can return to the cytosol in an activated (i.e. phosphorylated) form (Eactive). The localization of both the lipid kinase and phosphatases that act on phosphoinositide adds to the precise control of individual effectors.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005