spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 8, 2005
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.02459


Journal of Cell Science 118, 2545-2555 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, P. F.

Molecular stop signs: regulation of cell-cycle arrest by C/EBP transcription factors

Peter F. Johnson

Laboratory of Protein Dynamics and Signaling, Center for Cancer Research, NCI-Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702-1201, USA



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Domain organization of C/EBP-family members. Each C/EBP protein contains a functionally related leucine zipper dimerization domain (LZ) at its C-terminus. All family members, with the exception of C/EBP{zeta}, share an adjacent highly conserved basic region (BR) that mediates sequence-specific DNA binding. C/EBP{alpha}, C/EBPß, C/EBP{delta} and C/EBP{epsilon} each contain transactivation domains (TADs) and a regulatory domain (RD) located in their N-terminal regions. A tripartite TAD at the N-terminus displays homology among several of the family members (Williams et al., 1995Go). (B) The predicted structure of a C/EBP bZIP dimer bound to its cognate DNA site.

 


View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. C/EBP{alpha} functional domains, protein interaction regions and phosphorylation sites. The two major translational isoforms, p42 and p30, are shown. Three distinct transactivation elements (TE-I, TE-II and TE-III) have been identified (Friedman and McKnight, 1990Go; Nerlov and Ziff, 1994Go). Sequences mediating binding to various effector proteins regulating cell-cycle arrest are indicated; brackets denote regions whose boundaries are only approximately known. Two different CDK interaction regions have been reported (see text). Functionally relevant phosphoacceptor sites are depicted in blue.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Models of C/EBP{alpha}-induced cell-cycle arrest. The figure shows key events regulating G1-S progression during the mitotic cycle. Activation of CDK4/CDK6 and, later, CDK2 by induction of cyclins leads to phosphorylation of pRB and its release from E2F transcription factors. CDK inhibitors such as p21 can block this step. Dissociation of phosphorylated pRB relieves repression of S-phase genes, which are otherwise inhibited by pRB-E2F through recruitment of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex and histone deacetylases (not shown). The models of C/EBP{alpha} action fall into two categories: direct or p21-dependent inhibition of CDK activity (non-transcriptional) and repression of S-phase genes (transcriptional). C/EBP{alpha} may be tethered to target S-phase gene promoters indirectly by E2F or it could bind directly to E2F sites. Alternatively, S-phase genes might contain C/EBP-binding sites in their promoters (not shown).

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. C/EBP{alpha} basic region residues involved in protein-DNA interaction. Shown are important DNA base contacts and side chain interactions determined from the crystal structure. The sequence of the C/EBP{alpha} basic region and the palindromic consensus C/EBP site (blue lettering) are also depicted. Figure adapted from Miller et al. (Miller et al., 2003Go).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005