spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 3, 2005
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.02473


Journal of Cell Science 118, 3459-3470 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cecchi, C.
Right arrow Articles by Stefani, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cecchi, C.
Right arrow Articles by Stefani, M.

Insights into the molecular basis of the differing susceptibility of varying cell types to the toxicity of amyloid aggregates

Cristina Cecchi1,4, Serena Baglioni1, Claudia Fiorillo1, Anna Pensalfini1, Gianfranco Liguri1,4, Daniele Nosi2, Stefania Rigacci1, Monica Bucciantini1,4 and Massimo Stefani1,3,4,*

1 Department of Biochemical Sciences
2 Department of Anatomy, Histology and Forensic Medicine
3 Center of Excellence for Molecular and Clinical Studies in Chronic, Inflammatory, Degenerative and Tumoural Diseases for the Development of New Therapies
4 Interuniversity Centre for the Study of the Molecular Basis of Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Florence, Florence, 50134, Italy



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Various cell lines are differently affected by pre-fibrillar aggregates. Cell viability was checked by the MTT test, after supplementing cell culture media with 2.0 µM HypF-N pre-fibrillar aggregates. Values are relative to control cells treated with the soluble HypF-N (means ±s.d.). The inset shows the percentage of cell death in the most susceptible cell type (Hend) exposed to varying amounts of fibrillar (F) or pre-fibrillar (G) aggregates. Hend cells were pre-treated to enrich the cholesterol content of the plasma membrane before exposure to pre-fibrillar aggregates (G+cholesterol). For technical details see under Materials and Methods. The reported values are representative of six independent experiments, each performed in duplicate. *P≤0.05, significant difference vs cells exposed to the soluble HypF-N. **P≤0.05, significant difference vs not pre-treated cells exposed to the HypF-N pre-fibrillar aggregates.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Time-course of HypF-N binding to HeLa and Hend cells (either normal or enriched in membrane cholesterol). Both cell lines were exposed for 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60 minutes to 2.0 µM HypF-N pre-fibrillar aggregates and then washed twice with PBS. The residual aggregate-cell complex was stained with 2.0 µM Congo Red for 20 minutes. Under these conditions, Congo Red-staining is a measure of the amount of prefibrillar aggregates adsorbed to cell membrane surface. Binding of HypF-N aggregates to Hend cell membranes was highly reduced following supplementation of the culture media with 0.5 mM water-soluble cholesterol.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Correlation between susceptibility and total antioxidant capacity. Basal TAC was correlated with cell viability (as determined by the MTT test) in cells exposed to 2.0 µM aggregated HypF-N for 24 hours. TAC values are expressed as pmol of ABTS{bullet}+ produced per mg of protein. For technical details see under Materials and Methods. TAC values are the means of three experiments carried out in duplicate.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Time course of ROS accumulation. Confocal microscopy analysis of the redox status of two different cell lines exposed for 15, 30, 60, 180 minutes to 2.0 µM HypF-N pre-fibrillar aggregates. ROS production was checked by incubating the exposed cells, for 10 minutes, in the presence of the redox fluorescent probe CM-H2 DCFA. For technical details see under Materials and Methods. The values shown are means of three experiments carried out in duplicate.

 


View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Changes of intracellular ROS and free Ca2+ levels in Hend cells checked by confocal analysis. Cells were exposed for 15, 30, 60, 180 minutes and 24 hours to 2.0 µM HypF-N pre-fibrillar aggregates and then fixed with 2.0% paraformaldehyde. ROS were obtained by incubating for 10 minutes the exposed cells in the presence of the redox fluorescent probe and by measuring the fluorescence of CM-H2 DCFA. Intracellular free Ca2+ levels were revealed by incubating the exposed cells for 15 minutes in the presence of the fluorescent dye Fluo-3AM. The data are reported as percentages of the values determined at time 0 and are expressed as means ±s.d. of four experiments each carried out in duplicate. For technical details see under Materials and Methods.

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Continuous confocal microscopy analysis of intracellular free Ca2+ levels in unfixed Hend and HeLa cells. Intracellular free Ca2+ levels were imaged by confocal microscopy using the fluorescent dye Fluo-3AM as a probe as described under Materials and Methods. Cells were exposed for 20 minutes to 2.0 µM HypF-N aggregates. Fluorescence is expressed as fractional change above the resting baseline, {Delta}F/F, where F is the average baseline fluorescence before aggregate exposure and {Delta}F is the fluorescence change over the baseline. The values shown are means ±s.d. of three independent experiments each carried out in triplicate. Bar, 30 µm.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005