QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online January 14, 2005
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.01649

This Article Summary Full Text Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Matthews, K. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Matthews, K. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The developmental cell biology of Trypanosoma brucei

Institute of Immunology and Infection Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK
(e-mail: keith.matthews{at}ed.ac.uk)

View larger version (40K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. The life cycle of Trypanosoma brucei. Trypanosomes proliferate in the bloodstream of mammalian hosts as morphologically slender forms. These cells express the bloodstream-stage-specific VSG coat to evade the mammalian immune response. The kinetoplast (the mitochondrial genome of the parasite) is located at the posterior end of the cell and mitochondrial activity is relatively repressed. As parasite numbers increase in the bloodstream, differentiation to morphologically stumpy forms occurs. These are division-arrested forms pre-adapted for transmission to tsetse flies. Upon uptake in a tsetse bloodmeal, procyclic forms are generated, these being proliferative in the fly midgut. Procyclic forms express a surface coat distinct from that of bloodstream forms, the VSG being lost and replaced by a coat composed of EP and GPEET procyclins. The kinetoplast is also repositioned to a sub-terminal position. After establishment in the fly midgut, trypanosomes arrest in division and then migrate to the tsetse salivary gland, where they attach as epimastigote forms. These are proliferative and attached through elaboration of their flagellum. Eventually, these generate non-proliferative metacyclic forms, which have re-acquired a VSG coat in preparation for transmission to a new mammalian host. Arrowheads represent differentiation events in the trypanosome life cycle.

View larger version (29K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Trypanosome cell architecture. A simplified representation of the location of the major structural features of the trypanosome cell. A cutaway section towards the anterior of the cell shows the microtubule cytoskeleton underlying the cell membrane. For more-detailed images of the trypanosome cell, the reader is referred to recent articles (Grunfelder et al., 2003; Overath and Engstler, 2004; Vaughan and Gull, 2003).

View larger version (92K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. The tripartite attachment complex. (A) An electron micrograph of the region of the flagellar pocket (labelled F.P). The basal body (BB) is shown connected to the kinetoplast through a series of unilateral filaments, which link the kinetoplast to the inner mitochondrial membrane (these are indicated by the small brackets). The exclusion zone filaments (indicated by a large bracket) link the mitochondrial outer membrane and the basal body. The inset shows a schematic representation of the region of the trypanosome cell shown in the electron micrograph. (B) A representation of the flagellar/basal bodies/kinetoplast region and its replication during the trypanosome cell cycle. The left-hand image is the organization of the tripartite attachment complex in G1 phase; the middle image represents S phase, when kinetoplast replication is underway, and when the probasal body has matured and two new probasal bodies have formed. The right-hand image shows segregation of the basal bodies and concomitant kinetoplast DNA segregation. Figure adapted with kind permission from K. Gull (University of Oxford, UK) and The American Society for Cell Biology (Ogbadoyi et al., 2003).

View larger version (44K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. The kinetoplast changes position during the trypanosome life cycle. (A) The relative position of the kinetoplast in trypomastigote bloodstream and procyclic forms and in epimastigote forms with respect to the nucleus and posterior end of the trypanosome. (B) A phase contrast image of cells undergoing differentiation between bloodstream stumpy forms and procyclic forms. The cells have been counter-stained with DAPI to reveal the position of the nucleus (N) and kinetoplast (K). In the three cells shown, the kinetoplast is progressively repositioned, being earliest in this process in the top cell and latest in the bottom cell. Panel B is reproduced from Matthews et al. (Matthews et al., 1995). Bar, 20 µm.

View larger version (68K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. The morphology of procyclic-form trypanosomes induced by ectopic overexpression of TbZFP2. (A) A phase contrast image of procyclic forms, one of which shows a greatly extended posterior end (nozzle). (B) A composite of the DNA of the trypanosome cell (labelled with DAPI and pseudocoloured blue; each cell contains a central nucleus and posterior kinetoplast) and staining with an antibody (YL1/2; Kilmartin et al., 1982) against tyrosinated -tubulin, which labels dynamic microtubules in the trypanosome cytoskeleton (pseudocoloured green). Note that the posterior end of each cell shows staining, as does the newly growing daughter flagellum (labelled F) and the basal bodies (labelled in two of the cells with an asterisk). The nozzle cell shows an extended region of staining at the posterior end of the cell, indicating microtubule extension in this region. Bar, 8 µm.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

Twitter