spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 9, 2005
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.02718


Journal of Cell Science 118, 5171-5180 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, R. P.

Secrets of a double agent: CDK7 in cell-cycle control and transcription

Robert P. Fisher

Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The ordering of the two universal steps in CDK activation is variable. In pathway 1, binding of cyclin to form an inactive complex precedes phosphorylation within the activation loop by a CAK. This is the obligate pathway for activation of CDK1–cyclin-B complexes by CDK7 in metazoan cells (Fisher and Morgan, 1994Go; Desai et al., 1995Go). The steps are switched around in pathway 2, in which a CAK phosphorylates the T-loop of a monomeric CDK, which only becomes active upon subsequent binding of a cyclin. This is the preferred, but not obligate, pathway for activation of CDKs by the fungal CAKs: Cak1 (Ross et al., 2000Go) and Csk1 (Tsakraklides and Solomon, 2002Go). It is also a pathway available to metazoan CDK2, which can be efficiently phosphorylated by CDK7 in the absence of a cyclin partner (Fisher and Morgan, 1994Go; S. Larochelle and R.P.F., unpublished).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Alternative strategies to link CDK activation to RNA polymerase II (Pol II) phosphorylation. (A) The TFIIH-associated CDK-cyclin-RING protein complex has been conserved throughout eukaryotic evolution but is incapable of activating cell-cycle CDKs in budding yeast. The monomeric kinase responsible for all known CDK-activating phosphorylation in S. cerevisiae (Cak1) has a non-essential ortholog (Csk1) with similar functions in S. pombe, but there is no such enzyme in metazoan cells. Thus, the CAK-CDK networks controlling cell division and gene expression are connected at different levels depending on the organism: directly by a common enzyme that is both a CAK and a CTD kinase in most eukaryotes, and by the upstream CAK common to both transcriptional and cell-cycle CDKs in budding yeast. Fission yeast has both connections. (B) The XPD helicase tethers, and may actively recruit, the CDK7 complex to the TFIIH core. XPD has also been proposed to sequester CAK in the cytoplasm during interphase in Drosophila embryos; its degradation by an unknown mechanism might release CDK7 to sustain the high levels of CDK activation needed during mitosis.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005