spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 8 March 2005
doi: 10.1242/jcs.01710


Journal of Cell Science 118, 1363-1372 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atiya-Nasagi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sagi-Eisenberg, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atiya-Nasagi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sagi-Eisenberg, R.

O-glycosylation is essential for intracellular targeting of synaptotagmins I and II in non-neuronal specialized secretory cells

Yafit Atiya-Nasagi1, Hila Cohen1, Ora Medalia1, Mitsunori Fukudan2 and Ronit Sagi-Eisenberg1,*

1 Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
2 Fukuda Initiative Research Unit, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of constructs used in this study. The diagrams show the positions of the chimeric proteins comprising Syt I and Syt II. C, cytosolic domain; HA, hemagglutinin; J, juxtamembrane domain; L, luminal domain; T7, 11 residue peptide (MASMTGGQQMG) derived from the major capsid protein of the T7 phage; TM, transmembrane domain.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Cellular localization of Syt I and Syt II. (A) RBL cells transiently transfected with T7-Syt I, HA-Syt II or stably transfected with Syt II were grown on glass coverslips for 24 hours. Cells were subsequently labeled with anti-T7 monoclonal antibodies (a), anti-HA monoclonal antibodies (b) or anti-C2A-Syt IX polyclonal antibodies (c) followed by Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-mouse or Rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG. Cells were processed for immunofluorescent staining and visualized by confocal microscopy. (B) Subcellular fractionation of T7-Syt I or HA-Syt II-transfected RBL cells. Cell homogenates derived from RBL cells transfected with either T7-Syt I or HA-Syt II cDNA were fractionated on continuous sucrose gradients as described previously (Baram et al., 1999Go). Fractions were collected from the top, subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-T7, anti-HA or anti-Gi2{alpha} antibodies. Fractions were also examined for ß-hexosaminidase activity (presented as OD at 405 nm). Bar, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Visualization of the cellular localization of Syt I and Syt II chimeric proteins. (A) RBL cells transiently double transfected with HA-Syt I/Syt II and T7-Syt I cDNA were grown on glass coverslips and labeled with polyclonal anti-HA and monoclonal anti-T7 antibodies followed by Rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-mouse and FITC-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG. (B) RBL cells transiently transfected with HA-Syt I/Syt II cDNA were grown on glass coverslips and double stained with polyclonal anti-HA and monoclonal anti-serotonin antibodies followed by Rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit and FITC-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG. (C) RBL cells, transiently transfected with HA-Syt II (1-183aa)/Syt I (a), HA-Syt II (1-86aa)/Syt I (b) or HA-Syt II (1-60aa)/Syt I (c) cDNA, were grown on glass coverslips and stained with monoclonal anti-HA antibodies. Cells were processed for immunofluorescent staining and visualized by confocal microscopy. Bar, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Subcellular fractionation of HA-Syt I/Syt II- or HA-Syt II/Syt I-expressing RBL cells. Cell homogenates derived from RBL cells transiently transfected with HA-Syt I/Syt II or HA-Syt II(1-183aa)/Syt I cDNA were fractionated on continuous sucrose gradients as described previously (Baram et al., 1999Go). Fractions were collected from the top, subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-HA antibodies. Fractions were also examined for ß-hexosaminidase activity (presented as OD at 405 nm).

 


View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Biosynthetic routes of Syt I and Syt II. RBL cells, transiently transfected with Syt II (a-c) or T7-Syt I (d-g) cDNA, were grown on glass coverslips for 1 hour (a-f) or 5 hours (g) and then incubated for 2 hours at 20°C (a-f) or for 1 hour at 4°C in the presence of monoclonal antibodies directed against T7 (1 µg/ml) (g). Cells were subsequently transferred to 37°C (time zero) and incubated for the indicated time periods. Cells were stained with polyclonal antibodies directed against C2A-Syt IX (a-c) or with monoclonal antibodies directed against T7 (d-f) followed by Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies. Cells were visualized by laser confocal microscopy. Bar, 5 µm.

 


View larger version (71K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effect of inhibitors of internalization on HA-Syt I/Syt II trafficking. RBL cells transiently transfected with HA-Syt I/Syt II cDNA were grown on glass coverslips for 1 hour and subsequently incubated for 2 hours at 20°C (a). Cells were then warmed to 37°C for 3 hours in the absence (b) or presence of chloroquine (100 µM) (c) or sucrose (0.45 M) (d). Cells were subsequently stained with monoclonal anti-HA antibodies followed by Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody. Cells were processed for immunofluorescence and visualized by laser confocal microscopy. Bar, 5 µm.

 


View larger version (91K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Cellular localization of GFP-tagged Syt II. RBL cells stably transfected with Syt II-GFP (A) or Flag-Syt II-GFP (A,B) were grown on glass coverslips and either left untreated (A) or were serum starved for 1 hour and subsequently incubated for the indicated time periods with Texas Red-conjugated Tfn (50 µg/ml) (B). Cells were fixed and visualized by laser confocal microscopy. Bar, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Western blot analysis of HA-Syt II expressed in RBL cells. Cell extracts (80 µg) derived from RBL cells stably transfected with either (A) non-tagged Syt II (1) or HA-Syt II (2) cDNA, or (B) Syt II-GFP or Flag-Syt II-GFP cDNA or (C) transiently transfected with T7-Syt I, T7-Syt I(T15/16/A) or T7-Syt I(T26/A) cDNA, were resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting with either monoclonal anti-Syt II or anti-HA antibodies as indicated (A), or anti-GFP antibodies (B), or anti-T7 antibodies (C). The positions of the molecular mass markers are shown on the right in A. Arrows point to fully, partially or non-modified immunoreactive proteins.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Analysis of glycosylation of tagged Syt I and II. (A) RBL cells transiently transfected with T7-Syt I, HA-Syt II or the chimeras HA-Syt I/Syt II and HA-Syt II(1-183aa)/Syt I cDNA were grown for 2 hours at 37°C and subsequently left untreated or incubated for 24 hours in the presence of tunicamycin (10 µg/ml). Cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and probed with either anti-T7 or anti-HA antibodies, as indicated. (B) Cell lysates derived from RBL cells transfected with T7-Syt I, HA-Syt II, HA-Syt I/Syt II and HA-Syt II(1-183aa)/Syt I cDNA were treated with N-glycosidase F or buffer as described in Materials and Methods. Lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-T7 or anti-HA antibodies. (C) Cell lysates (80 µg) derived from RBL cells stably transfected with Syt II-GFP or Flag-Syt II-GFP were treated with N-glycosidase F, resolved on SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-GFP antibodies. The asterisks in panels A-C indicate proteins that were reduced by tunicamycin or N-glycosidase F treatment. (D) RBL cells transfected with Syt II(T34/A)-GFP or Flag-Syt II(T34/A)-GFP were subjected to tunicamycin or (E) N-glycosidase F treatment as described above. (F) Lysates (80 µg) derived from RBL cells transiently transfected with Flag-Syt II-GFP (WT)(1, 5) or Flag-Syt II(T34/A)-GFP ({Delta}N)(2), or Syt II-GFP (WT)(3) or Syt II(T34/A)-GFP ({Delta}N)(4) or Flag-Syt II(T17/18/19/A)-GFP ({Delta}O) (6) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-GFP antibodies. Lane 3 is a longer ECL exposure time of the lane marked 3*.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Visualization of T7-Syt I and Syt II glycosylation mutants. RBL cells transiently transfected with T7-Syt I(T26/A) (a) or T7-Syt I(T15/16/A) (b) or Syt II(T17/18/19/A) (c) were grown on glass coverslips for 24 hours and subsequently labeled with anti-T7 monoclonal antibodies (a,b) or polyclonal antibodies directed against C2A-Syt IX (c) followed by the relevant Cy3-conjugated (a,c) or Cy2-conjugated secondary antibodies. Cells were processed for immunofluorescent staining and visualized by confocal microscopy. The z-line image is of the same field as in b and confirms the plasma membrane localization of the {Delta}O mutant. Bar, 10 µm.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005