spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 20, 2006
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.03053


Journal of Cell Science 119, 2635-2641 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Srebrow, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kornblihtt, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Srebrow, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kornblihtt, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The connection between splicing and cancer

Anabella Srebrow and Alberto R. Kornblihtt*

Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular, Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular, IFIBYNE-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón 2, (C1428EHA) Buenos Aires, Argentina


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Cis-acting sequences that control splicing. (A) Consensus sequences for the 5' splice site (donor), branch site and 3' splice site (acceptor). (B) Arrangement of donor (D) and acceptor (A) sites in the architecture of a typical eukaryotic gene. Whereas internal exons are limited by acceptor and donor sites, the first exon is limited by the Cap site and a donor, and the last exon is limited by an acceptor and the poly(A) site. (C) Examples of sequences for strong and weak acceptor sites. Red indicates the 3' acceptor splice site; bold indicates deviations from the consensus sequence. (D) Schematic roles of exonic splicing enhancers (ESE), exonic splicing silencers (ESS), intronic splicing enhancers (ISE) and intronic splicing silencers (ISS) on the recognition of a weak acceptor by the splicing machinery; red indicates enhancing, blue indicates silencing. In A-D, exon sequences are boxed.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (A) Different modes of alternative splicing. (B) Alternative promoters provoke mRNA diversity but do not necessarily imply alternative splicing. There are two alternative promoters, P1 and P2. If promoter P2 is used, exons 2, 3 and 4 are constitutively included. If promoter P1 is used, exon 2 simply does not exist for the splicing machinery because, being a 5' terminal exon of the P1 transcription unit, it lacks an upstream 3' splice site. Therefore, the splicing machinery has no option but to join exon 1 directly to exon 3, generating a 1-3-4 mRNA.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Causes and consequences of splicing pattern alterations. For simplicity, only SR and hnRNP proteins are shown. However, other factors not belonging to any of these families could also be targets of these signaling pathways (e.g. Sam68).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006