First published online 15 August 2006
doi: 10.1242/jcs.03070
Journal of Cell Science 119, 3593-3601 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
Epidermal and craniofacial defects in mice overexpressing Klf5 in the basal layer of the epidermis
Inderpreet Sur1,*,
Björn Rozell2,
Viljar Jaks1,
Åsa Bergström1 and
Rune Toftgård1
1 Department of Bioscience and Nutrition, Clinical Research Center, and Department of Laboratory Medicine Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Novum, SE-141 57 Huddinge, Sweden
2 Unit for Morphological Phenotype Analysis, Clinical Research Center, and Department of Laboratory Medicine Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Novum, SE-141 57 Huddinge, Sweden

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Cranioabdominoschisis and ectodermal dysplasia in bi-transgenics. (a) Overall morphology of wild-type and K5tTA/TRE-KLF5 bi-transgenic embryos at E16.5. (b) Skeletons of E17.5 embryos. The skeletons were double-stained with Alizarin Red and Alcian Blue. Bone is stained red and cartilage is blue. (c) Skull sections of E16.5 embryos. Bars, 500 µm. (1) Haematoxylin-Eosin-stained skull sections showing absence of vibrissae follicles and incisors in the bi-transgenic embryo. (2) Immunohistochemical staining with anti-keratin5 antibody showing the arrested molar development at the early bud-stage in the bi-transgenic embryo. (3) Immunohistochemical staining with anti-keratin5 antibody showing the absence of eyelid formation in the bi-transgenic embryo. (d) Expression of the KLF5 transgene in E16.5 embryos analysed by (1) RT-PCR and (2) immunohistochemistry using anti-Klf5 antibody. Bar, 50 µm.
|
|

View larger version (60K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Hypoproliferative epidermis and skin barrier defects in the bi-transgenics. (a) Decreased proliferation in the epidermis of the K5tTA/TRE-Klf5 bi-transgenic embryos (E16.5) compared with the wild type. Haematoxylin-Eosin-stained sections of dorsal skin at E16.5 (upper panel). Immunohistochemical staining of E16.5 dorsal skin with the anti-Ki67 antibody (lower panel). Bar, 50 µm. (b) Defective skin barrier in a bi-transgenic embryo compared with a wild-type embryo at E17.5.
|
|

View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Altered expression of cytokeratin markers in the epidermis of the bi-transgenics. Immunohistochemical staining of dorsal skin from E18.5 embryos with anti-keratin5, loricrin, anti-keratin1, anti-keratin17 or anti-keratin8 antibodies showing abnormal expression of keratin1, 8, 17 but normal compartmentalization of keratin5 and loricrin. Bar, 50 µm.
|
|

View larger version (82K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Abnormal epidermal morphology in the bi-transgenics. Ultrastructural analysis of wild-type and bi-transgenic epidermis from E14.5 embryos. Magnification, x3800. Inset shows higher magnification (x107,000) view of granules (marked by arrow) observed in the suprabasal cells of the bi-transgenic embryos.
|
|

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Reduced p63 expression in the bi-transgenics. (a) Immunohistochemical staining of a dorsal skin section from E18.5 wild-type and K5tTA/TRE-KLF5 bi-transgenic embryos with anti-p63 (4A4) antibody. Bar, 50 µm. (b) RT-PCR analysis of different transcripts from skin of E16.5 and E18.5 embryos. Lane 1, E16.5 wild type; lane 2, E16.5 bi-transgenic; lane 3, E18.5 wild type; lane 4, E18.5 bi-transgenic.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006