spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online January 12, 2006
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.02815


Journal of Cell Science 119, 208-216 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hooker, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hurlin, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hooker, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hurlin, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Of Myc and Mnt

C. William Hooker and Peter J. Hurlin*

Shriners Hospitals for Children and Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3101 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Working model for the relationship between activating Myc-Max complexes and repressive Mnt-Max, Mxd-Max and Mga-Max complexes. Myc-Max complexes are postulated to affect global gene regulation through binding thousands of E-box, as well as non-E-box, sequences, where they would activate transcription. Myc targets include genes regulated by RNA polymerase (pol) II, as well as RNA pol I. Myc also regulates RNA pol III complexes by engaging the pol III basal machinery. Mnt-Max, Mxd-Max and Mga-Max complexes can bind to E-box sequences and repress transcription. Studies in Drosophila indicate that dMnt and dMyc bind at both shared and unique sites. The extent to which Mnt-Max, Mad-Max and Mga-Max complexes counter Myc-dependent global transcription and impinge on the various activities of Myc remains unclear. Not depicted is transcriptional repression by Myc-Max-Miz1 complexes, which might not be affected either by Mnt-Max, or Mad-Max or Mga-Max complexes. *CACGTG and related sequences.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Schematic diagrams showing theoretical relationships between different Max complexes during (A) cell-cycle exit, (B-D) cell-cycle entry and the proliferative cell cycle. Although Max can homodimerize, all Max is portrayed in a complex with its heterodimerization partners. Note that this model predicts that the relative levels of Max complexes change as a result of deregulated Myc (C) and loss of Mnt (D).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006