spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 7 August 2007
doi: 10.1242/jcs.006619


Journal of Cell Science 120, 3086-3098 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gopinath, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dhawan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gopinath, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dhawan, J.

The RhoA effector mDiaphanous regulates MyoD expression and cell cycle progression via SRF-dependent and SRF-independent pathways

Suchitra Devi Gopinath1, Shuh Narumiya2 and Jyotsna Dhawan1,*

1 Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad, 500 007, India
2 Department of Pharmacology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Knockdown of mDia1 suppresses SRF activity, MyoD expression and cell cycle progression. (A) Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of mDia1 mRNA in cells transfected with control GFP shRNA (sh-GFP) and mDia1 shRNA (sh-mDia). Values represent normalized fold differences between mDia1 and GAPDH mRNA in each sample (n=3) ± s.d. (B,C) MyoD expression in myoblasts co-transfected with empty vector or mDia1 shRNA and a GFP reporter, 24 hours after transfection (mean ± s.d., n=4, P<0.0013). (D) Knockdown of mDia1 reduces SRF activity. Normalized SRF activity in C2C12 myoblasts co-transfected with mDia1 shRNA or empty vector, the SRF reporter 3D.Aluc and beta-gal (mean ± s.d., n=4, P<0.0001). (E) FACS analysis of mDia1-knockdown cells shows an increased G1 population compared with control cells.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. mDia1 regulates MyoD by an SRF-independent pathway. (A) Schematic of full-length mDia1 (FL) and five truncation derivatives. (B,C) mDia1{Delta}N3 activates SRF. C2C12 myoblasts were co-transfected with full-length mDia1 (FL), mDia1 mutants or a GFP control, the SRF reporter and a beta-gal plasmid. To minimize effects of serum on SRF activity, transfected cells were incubated in 0.5% serum for 24 hours before assay. mDia{Delta}N3 increased SRF activity >25 fold (mean ± s.e.m., n=4, P<0.0041). Western blotting with anti-GFP (panel B, inset) showed that all mutants were expressed at relatively equal levels. (C) Quantification of MyoD expression detected by immunofluorescence assay in cells overexpressing GFP (control), full-length mDia1 (FL) or mDia1 mutants ({Delta}N3, Hind3, F2, H+P, CC). Despite strongly activating SRF, mDia1{Delta}N3 suppresses MyoD expression maximally (mean ± s.e.m., n=7, P<0.0001). (D) Immunodetection of MyoD expression in C2C12 myoblasts transiently transfected with GFP-tagged mDia1 truncation mutants ({Delta}N3, H+P, CC).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. mDia1 mutants that affect MyoD expression cause G1 arrest without differentiation. (A) Cell cycle analysis of C2C12 myoblasts transfected with GFP-tagged {Delta}N3 or N3HindIII 24 hours after transfection. Transfected (T) and untransfected (U) cells were distinguished by gating on GFP. (B) A greater proportion of {Delta}N3 and {Delta}N3HindIII transfected cells showed a G1 DNA content compared with untransfected cells (mean ± s.e.m., n=4, P<0.0002). (C,D) {Delta}N3 transfected cells show reduced BrdU incorporation. Immunodetection of BrdU (green) in cells transfected with Flag-tagged mDia{Delta}N3 (red) (mean ± s.d., n=3). (E,F) {Delta}N3 transfected cells do not differentiate. {Delta}N3 transfected cells were stained for Myogenin and p21, after 24 hours in differentiation medium (mean ± s.e.m., n=2). Arrows indicate transfected cells that are negative for two markers of differentiation: p21 (top) or Myogenin (middle), but positive for p27, a marker of reversible arrest (bottom). (G) Quantification of p27 induction: mDia mutants that affect MyoD expression ({Delta}N3, {Delta}N3HindIII, H+P) induce expression of p27 (mean ± s.e.m., n=4).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. APC inhibits MyoD expression: Microtubule-association of APC is not essential. (A) APC inhibits MyoD expression: Confocal analysis of cells transfected with full-length APC (APC-FL-GFP) or APC lacking the microtubule-binding domain (APC{Delta}MT-GFP). Full-length APC is microtubule associated whereas APC{Delta}MT-GFP localizes to the cytoplasm; both forms effectively inhibit MyoD expression (red). Bar, 20 µm. (B) Quantification of MyoD expression in cells transfected with GFP alone (control) APC-FL-GFP or APC{Delta}MT-GFP (mean ± s.e.m., n=2).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. mDia negatively regulates beta-catenin localization. (A) The specific GSK3beta inhibitor BIO induces nuclear localization of endogenous beta-catenin (red) and increased cell-cell contact (phase) in myoblasts after a 24-hour treatment in growth medium. Bar, 10 µm (25 µm in phase). (B) mDia{Delta}N3 inhibits beta-catenin nuclear localization in BIO-treated cells. Myoblasts were transiently transfected with control (EGFP), mDia1-FL, {Delta}N3, HIND3, H+P or F2 constructs (all GFP-tagged), treated with 2.5 µM BIO for 24 hours and stained for beta-catenin (red). In {Delta}N3 and HIND3-transfected cells, accumulation of beta-catenin at cell-cell contacts correlates with loss of nuclear staining. (C) Confocal analysis shows absence of beta-catenin staining in the nuclei of {Delta}N3-transfected cells. Bar, 10 µm. (D) Quantification of the effects of GFP-tagged mDia constructs on beta-catenin localization (mean ± s.e.m., n=2).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. mDia negatively regulates TCF. (A) TCF activity is suppressed by mDia1{Delta}N3 and activated by mDia knockdown. (i) Myoblasts were co-transfected with the TCF reporter plasmid TOP-flash + GFP (control) or mDia1{Delta}N3 ({Delta}N3) and TCF-dependent luciferase activity measured. Values represent normalized ratios of TOP-flash activity to the respective FOP-flash control (mean ± s.e.m., n=11, P<0.0001). (ii) Myoblasts were co-transfected with TOP-flash + mU6 vector (control) or mDia1 shRNA (shRNA) and luciferase activity measured as in (i) (mean ± s.e.m., n=5, P<0.0021). (iii) Comparison of effects of full-length (FL) and different mDia mutants on TCF activity (values represent normalized TCF activity, mean ± s.e.m., n=2). {Delta}N3 is the most effective at suppressing TCF activity. (B) Inhibition of TCF suppresses MyoD expression. Cells were transfected with GFP alone (control) or along with dominant negative TCF-1E (DN TCF-lacking the beta-catenin-binding domain) and MyoD expression quantified (mean ± s.e.m., n=3, P<0.0021). (C) SRF activity is not affected by beta-catenin S37A and dnTCF. Myoblasts were co-transfected with the SRF reporter with control (pBS), {Delta}N3, S37A or DN TCF constructs and luciferase activity measured. (mean ± s.e.m., n=4).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. MyoD DRR activity is inhibited by mDia. (A) Gel-shift assays of the putative TCF/LEF sites in the MyoD DRR. 32P-end-labeled oligo probes representing a TCF consensus site or two of the three sites from the MyoD DRR (denoted DRR site A or DRR site B) were incubated with extracts prepared from control C2C12 myoblasts (indicated as `c') or myoblasts treated with 2.5 µM BIO for 24 hours. Assays were performed in the presence or absence of 100-fold molar excess of the respective cold competitor oligo. The consensus TCF site participated in the formation of complexes that were competed by excess cold probe, and induced by BIO (black arrow) consistent with the binding of beta-catenin–TCF. The gray arrow indicates a nonspecific complex. However, DRR sites A and B bound a nonspecific complex (indicated by *) that was neither competed nor BIO-inducible. Thus, the TCF consensus sites in the MyoD DRR do not appear to function as targets of specific nuclear factor binding. (B) MyoD DRR activity is inhibited by mDia. Myoblasts were transiently transfected in growth medium with a mouse MyoD DRR-pGL3 promoter construct along with pBS (control) or mDia constructs, and a betagal plasmid. Luciferase activity was quantified after 24 hours and normalized for transfection efficiency (mean ± s.e.m., n=3). {Delta}N3 is the most effective at suppressing DRR activity, and overall the DRR suppressive activity of the different forms of mDia1 correlated with suppression of TCF activity.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Overexpression of an APC-independent form of beta-catenin leads to functional bypass of mDia{Delta}N3 inhibition. (A) Myoblasts were co-transfected with a control plasmid (GFP), {Delta}N3+GFP or {Delta}N3+ beta-catenin S37A and TCF activity determined (mean ± s.e.m., n=5, P<0.0046). (B) MyoD expression in cells transfected as in A. Note that {Delta}N3+ beta-catenin S37A transfected cells retain the elongated morphology typical of {Delta}N3 transfectants but are MyoD+. (C) Quantification of MyoD expression in myoblasts transfected with either {Delta}N3+ beta-catenin S37A or {Delta}N3HindIII+ beta-catenin S37A. The degradation-resistant beta-catenin S37A mutant partially reverses the inhibition of MyoD expression mediated by both mDia derivatives. (mean ± s.e.m., **P<0.0002, n=6; *P<0.046, n=3).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. mDia{Delta}N3 controls MyoD by reciprocal regulation of two transcription factors. A model for dual signaling to the MyoD gene by mDia via positive regulation of a directly acting Rho-actin-SRF pathway and negative regulation of an indirect APC–beta-catenin–TCF pathway. Actin assembly factors bind to the FH1 and FH2 domains, drive polymerization of microfilaments to activate SRF via MAL release and thereby induce MyoD expression. The interaction of mDia with APC may increase cytoplasmic degradation of beta-catenin or reduce nuclear shuttling of APC and thereby promote cytoplasmic retention of beta-catenin. As dnTCF inhibits MyoD, TCF may play an activating role by inducing positive upstream factors (X). Taken together, the data suggest that MyoD expression is suppressed by any perturbation of mDia, because SRF and TCF are reciprocally regulated by this key signaling adaptor protein.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007