QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online February 7, 2007
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.03365

This Article Summary Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Newell-Litwa, K. Articles by Faundez, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Newell-Litwa, K. Articles by Faundez, V.

Neuronal and non-neuronal functions of the AP-3 sorting machinery

Karen Newell-Litwa^1,2, Eunju Seong^3,*, Margit Burmeister³ and Victor Faundez^1,4,

¹ Department of Cell Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
² The Graduate Program in Biochemistry, Cell, and Developmental Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
³ Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
⁴ Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Nomenclature and structure of AP-3 subunit isoforms. (A) AP-3 subunit genes and their corresponding gene products. The pattern of expression of each subunit is described as neuronal, corresponding to neurons and neuro-endocrine tissue, or ubiquitous, for subunits expressed in all cells including neuronal tissues. Mice carrying natural or engineered AP-3 subunit deficiencies are listed. (B) Proposed subunit composition of the neuronal and ubiquitous AP-3 isoforms. Both AP-3 complexes can carry either a 3A or a 3B subunit. (C) Adaptor complexes possess three defined domains. The ears correspond to the C-terminal domains of and 3. The trunk or core is composed of a protease-resistant core formed by fragments of 3 and as well as full-length µ3 and 3 subunits. The ears and trunk are connected by hinges.

View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Molecular interactions of the adaptor complex AP-3. The diagram depicts AP-3 subunits. is shown in red, 3 is shown in green, µ3 is shown in brown and 3 is shown in blue. Known interactions with a particular AP-3 subunit are indicated by a solid arrow. Interactions with AP-3 where the subunit is not known are depicted by a dashed arrow. These interactions correspond to PACS-1 (Crump et al., 2001), a casein kinase (Faundez and Kelly, 2000), BLOC-1 (Di Pietro et al., 2006) and inositol phospholipids (PI-Lipids). Vimentin (Styers et al., 2004), clathrin (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998) and the ataxia telangiectasia gene product (ATM) (Lim et al., 1998) directly associate with the 3 subunit. The subunit provides a platform sufficient to bind HIV Gag protein (Dong et al., 2005), protein G of the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV-G) (Nishimura et al., 2002) or the R-(v)-SNARE VAMP7-TI (Martinez-Arca et al., 2003). Alternatively adaptin in a complex with 3 or 3 by itself binds di-leucine sorting motifs ([DE]xxx[LI]) (Janvier et al., 2003), AGAP1 (Nie et al., 2003), the Arf1 GTPase (Lefrancois et al., 2004), the ear domain (Lefrancois et al., 2004), and the insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) (VanRenterghem et al., 1998). Tyrosine sorting motifs (Yxx) bind to the µ3 subunits (Ohno et al., 1995).

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. AP-3 sorting mechanisms in neuronal cells. A neuron possesses neuronal and ubiquitous AP-3 complexes in the cell body (a) but only neuronal AP-3 in axons (b) and dendrites (c) (Seong et al., 2005). (A) Proposed functions of the neuronal and ubiquitous AP-3 in cell bodies. Both AP-3 forms reside in the same endosome. Neuronal AP-3 sorts proteins into the axon or a synaptic vesicle pathway. Ubiquitous AP-3 sorts proteins to the lysosomal pathway. Model A explains the changes in ZnT3 levels observed in Ap3b1–/– and Ap3b2–/– mice (Seong et al., 2005). In this model AP-3-sorted proteins, like ZnT3, are recognized by both AP-3 isoforms and therefore routed to either a synaptic vesicle-axonal or a lysosomal pathway. Thus, in the absence of one AP-3 isoform, membrane proteins are targeted to the other pathway. The amount of ZnT3 in synaptic vesicles is reduced in the absence of neuronal AP-3 (Ap3b2–/–) and ZnT3 is instead routed to lysosomes for degradation. Similarly, the amount of ZnT3 targeted to lysosomes is reduced in the absence of ubiquitous AP-3 (Ap3b1–/–) and it is then routed by the neuronal AP-3 (encoded by Ap3b2) to synaptic vesicles, thus triggering increased levels of ZnT3 in synaptic vesicles. Model B shows the proposed role of neuronal AP-3 in synaptic vesicle biogenesis in presynaptic terminals. AP-3 generates synaptic vesicles from presynaptic endosomes. This route is parallel to the AP-2 route, which generates synaptic vesicles from the plasma membrane. A role for AP-3 in sorting to dendrites (c) has not been documented yet.

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Models of BLOC-1–AP-3 sorting functions. (A,B) Two different vesicles, A and B, fuse with a target organelle (right). VAMP7-TI is present in vesicle A (blue cylinder). Its cognate Q-(t)-SNAREs (syntaxin 7, 8 and Vti1b; orange cylinders) are present in the target organelle. Model A depicts AP-3 and BLOC-1 complexes co-residing in vesicle A (Salazar et al., 2006). In this vesicle, BLOC-1 may regulate the recognition of specific cargoes, like the SNARE VAMP7-TI, either by bridging AP-3 and a selected membrane protein (interactions 2 and 3) or by stabilizing specific AP-3–cargo interactions (interactions 1 and 2). Interactions 1 (Martinez-Arca et al., 2003) and 2 have been documented (Di Pietro et al., 2006) and (G. Salazar and V.F., unpublished results). Interaction 3 is speculative. On the target membrane a tripartite Q-(t)-SNARE complex of syntaxin 7, syntaxin 8, and Vti1b is maintained by BLOC-1, independently of AP-3. Model B depicts the selective sorting of SNAREs or tissue-specific cargo into vesicle B by the BLOC-1 complex. Vesicle B represents a vesicle population distinct from vesicle A. Sorting into and/or biogenesis of vesicle B requires BLOC-1 but not AP-3 function. Model A and model B are non-exclusive. Either Model A alone or a combination of models A and B explain both the convergent sorting phenotypes of BLOC-1 and AP-3 deficiencies as well as the altered colocalization between syntaxins 7 and 8, which is unique to BLOC-1–mutant cells (Salazar et al., 2006).

View larger version (37K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Subunit composition and molecular interactions of the BLOC-1 complex. (A) The model depicts the known subunit structure of the BLOC-1 complex. (B) The name of each subunit is denoted by the initial letter of the protein name. The diagram describes the intrinsic interactions between subunits of the BLOC-1 complex. For details see (Di Pietro and Dell'Angelica, 2005). (C) The diagram represents a partial list of interactions (solid lines), functional relationships (dashed line), or potential relationships (double-headed arrow with question mark) relevant to vesicle generation, fusion, and the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. A detailed list of interactions is described in (Di Pietro and Dell'Angelica, 2005).