spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 13 May 2008
doi: 10.1242/jcs.012013


Journal of Cell Science 121, 1852-1860 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zehmer, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zehmer, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. G. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Identification of a novel N-terminal hydrophobic sequence that targets proteins to lipid droplets

John K. Zehmer, René Bartz, Pingsheng Liu and Richard G. W. Anderson*

Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9039, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. The AAM-B constructs used in this study and alignment of the N-terminal hydrophobic regions of AAM-B, ALDI, CYB5R3 and CYP2C9. (A) Wild-type AAM-B (WT) has four domains: an N-terminal hydrophobic region, a putative juxtamembrane domain, a putative methyltransferase domain and a C-terminal region that lacks any distinguishing features. Deletions made in the various regions as well as three chimeric proteins used in this study are shown. Each diagram represents a single construct, with the exception of AS1-7, which is a summary of seven constructs: the seven numbered boxes represent the regions mutated to alanines in the corresponding seven constructs. (B) Alignment of the first 23-28 amino acids of AAM-B, its close homolog ALDI, CYB5R3 and the p450 family member CYP2C9. Shaded boxes highlight hydrophobic residues (amino acid value>0 on the Kyte-Doolittle scale). Acidic residues are in red, basic residues in blue and prolines are highlighted yellow.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. AAM-B is targeted to droplets. (A) HeLa cells were transfected with cDNA encoding C-terminally Myc-tagged AAM-B and grown for 15 hours in media containing 100 µM oleic acid to induce lipid droplets. The cells were fixed and processed for indirect immunofluorescence localization of Myc (1,4) and protein disulfide isomerase (5) or stained for lipids with Bodipy 493/503 (2). Most cells had Myc staining (1) restricted to the periphery of neutral lipid-positive (2) droplets, as shown in the merge (3). Other cells displayed Myc staining (4) around lipid droplets and, in addition, a reticular pattern distributed throughout the cell that co-localized with {alpha}-PDI IgG (5), as shown in the merge (6). (B) HeLa cells grown on coverslips in the absence of oleate were transfected with cDNAs encoding wild-type, Myc-tagged AAM-B. At various times post-transfection, the cells on the coverslip were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence detection of Myc. The cells remaining in the dish were collected, lysed and processed for immunoblotting to detect Myc (inset). To quantify the distribution of AAM-B, images of stained cells were systematically acquired until 50 cells had been photographed for each time point. The cells were then scored for the presence of either lipid droplet alone, or droplet plus reticular ER staining patterns. We did not detect any expressing cells until after a 2 hour incubation. Each point is the average ±s.e.m. of three separate experiments. Scale bars: 5 µm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Deletion of amino acids 6-28 interrupts AAM-B targeting to droplets. The indicated AAM-B mutants were expressed in HeLa cells and processed for immunofluorescence. (A-C) Deletion of amino acids 2-18 (N2) did not disrupt the targeting of AAM-B (A) to Bodipy 493/503-positive (B) lipid droplets (C). (D-F) AAM-B lacking amino acids 6-28 (N3) had a cytosolic distribution (D). Brightly staining regions (arrows) appear to be insoluble aggregates that do not overlap with Bodipy 493/503-stained (E) lipid droplets (F). (G-I) AAM-B with amino acids 1-23 of CYP2C9 substituted for amino acids 1-28 ({delta}N) had a reticular pattern (G) that was not even weakly associated with Bodipy-positive (H) droplets (I). Scale bars: 5 µm.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Amino acids 1-28 are sufficient to target proteins to droplets. AAM-B mutants were expressed in HeLa cells and processed for immunofluorescence. (A-C) Deletion of amino acids 29-61 in the juxtamembrane region (A) disrupted targeting to Bodipy 493/593-positive (B) droplets (C). (D-F) GFP was fused to the C-terminal end of AAM-B amino acids 1-28 and expressed in HeLa cells. The chimera (D) was found in an ER pattern with some protein localized to ADRP-marked (E) droplets (F). (G-I) AAM-B amino acids 1-38 fused to GFP (G) co-localized with ADRP (H) on droplets (I). (J-L) Deletion of amino acids 29-38 from full-length AAM-B (J) did not influence targeting to Bodipy-positive (K) droplets (L). Scale bars: 5 µm.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. N-terminal hydrophobic sequences from other droplet proteins are sufficient to target droplets. (A-C) Amino acids 1-28 from AAM-B fused to Rab5 S34N (A) target Bodipy-positive (B) droplets (C). (D-F) Amino acids 1-27 of mouse ALDI fused to Rab5 S34N were sufficient to target the protein (D) to Bodipy-positive (E) droplets (F). (G-I) Protein comprising amino acids 1-28 of CYB5R3 fused to Rab5 S34N (G) was also found surrounding Bodipy-positive (H) droplets (I). Scale bars: 5 µm.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. AAM-B targets to yeast lipid droplets. Cells were co-transformed with AAM-B-GFP and Erg6-DsRed and grown on selective plates. AAM-B-GFP (A,E) co-expressed with Erg6-DsRed (B,F) co-localized (C,G) on S. cerevisiae lipid bodies (shown under light microscopy in D,H). Scale bars: 5 µm.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Cell fractionation shows that AAM-B is targeted to droplets. (A) Protease-protection assay shows that AAM-B is exposed to the cytosol. HeLa cells were transfected with GFP-AAM-B-Myc and equal aliquots of the total membranes were incubated in the absence (lane 1) or presence (lanes 2 and 3) of trypsin. Lane 3 contained a protease inhibitor. An immunoblot for calnexin (Cnx) shows that the protein is reduced by ~10 kDa, which corresponds to the size of the cytosolic part of the protein. GFP and Myc are digested in the presence of trypsin, demonstrating that they are cytosolically oriented. (B-F) COS7 cells were transfected with cDNAs encoding Myc-tagged AAM-B constructs and cell fractions prepared. Equal volumes of the droplet, cytosol and membrane fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE. (B) A representative gel was stained with Coomassie Blue to determine the relative protein load for the immunoblots in C-F. (C-F) Each preparation was immunoblotted with {alpha}-Myc, {alpha}-ADRP, {alpha}-Bip, {alpha}-Sec61β, {alpha}-PDI and {alpha}-actin IgG. (C) The wild-type protein was found in both droplet and membrane fractions. (D) The {delta}N mutant was found solely in the membrane fraction. (E) The C6 mutant was found in the droplet fraction. (F) The {Delta}Jxm mutant was found in the membrane fraction.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. AAM-B on droplets can interact with itself. (A) Co-immunoprecipitation of Myc-tagged and HA-tagged AAM-B co-expressed in HeLa cells. HeLa cells were co-transfected with cDNA encoding either HA-tagged AAM-B, Myc-tagged AAM-B (lanes 2 and 4) or empty vector (lanes 1 and 3). The cells were solubilized with detergent and processed to immunoprecipitate AAM-B-Myc with {alpha}-Myc IgG. Samples of the cleared cell lysates (lanes 1 and 2) and the immunoprecipitates (lanes 3 and 4) were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with {alpha}-HA IgG, {alpha}-Myc IgG or {alpha}-p63 IgG. (B-G) Wild-type AAM-B can recruit truncated AAM-B from the cytoplasm to droplets. HeLa cells were co-transfected with a cDNA encoding Myc-tagged N3 and an empty vector (B-D). Cells were grown for 15 hours, fixed and processed for immunofluorescence detection of HA (B) and Myc (C). HeLa cells were co-transfected with a cDNA encoding Myc-tagged N3 and HA-tagged wild-type AAM-B (E-G). Cells were grown for 15 hours, fixed and processed for immunofluorescence detection of HA (E) and Myc (F). Scale bars: 5 µm.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008