
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Kazrin overexpression alters keratinocyte shape. (A-C) Primary human keratinocytes infected with HA-kazrinA retroviral vector (green). Note that HA-kazrinA colocalizes with periplakin (red) at cell-cell borders (C). (D-F) Primary human keratinocytes transiently expressing HA-kazrinA (E,F; green) have shape abnormalities and extend membrane projections (arrowheads) over neighbouring cells in contrast to control cells expressing GFP (D; green). F-actin is detected with phalloidin (red). Images are composites of z-stacks. Bars, 40 µm. (G-I) Shape factor analysis of keratinocytes transiently expressing GFP (G) or HA-kazrinA (H). In (H) examples of cells with high levels of kazrin are marked with an arrowhead, and cells with low levels are marked with an asterisk. The Discovery-1 biorobot was used to collect four images per coverslip on microscope slides containing three coverslips of transfected keratinocytes per condition. Transfectants were identified by GFP fluorescence or staining with HA-specific antibody. Using Metamorph 7 software, transfected cells were traced, copied and pasted into a new file. At least 20 transfectants were traced per condition, per experiment. Following thresholding, the shape factor was calculated. (G,H) Examples of traced keratinocytes from one experiment. (I) Summary of shape factor analysis; data are the means ± s.d. from four independent experiments. Statistical significance relative to GFP control was assessed with the paired Student's t-test (**P<0.005, n=4). (J) Keratinocytes transiently expressing GFP, HA-kazrinA, B or C were scored as `altered' if they exhibited loss of the normal round or cuboidal shape characteristic of an undifferentiated keratinocyte and/or loss of cortical actin. The total numbers of cells counted were: GFP, 1060; kazrinA, 1084; kazrinB, 621; kazrinC, 636. Data are the means ± s.d. of five (kazrinB and C) or eight (GFP and kazrinA) independent experiments. Statistical significance relative to GFP control was assessed with the unpaired Student's t-test (**P 0.0005, *P 0.005; n 5).
|