spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 28 October 2008
doi: 10.1242/jcs.032441


Journal of Cell Science 121, 3824-3833 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schonteich, E.
Right arrow Articles by Prekeris, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schonteich, E.
Right arrow Articles by Prekeris, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Rip11/Rab11-FIP5 and kinesin II complex regulates endocytic protein recycling

Eric Schonteich1, Gayle M. Wilson1, Jemima Burden2, Colin R. Hopkins2, Keith Anderson1, James R. Goldenring3 and Rytis Prekeris1,*

1 Department of Cellular and Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 12801 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
3 Departments of Surgery and Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University and the Nashville VA Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Rip11/FIP5 is enriched in peripheral recycling endosomes. (A-F) HeLa cells were plated on collagen-coated glass coverslips fixed and stained with anti-TfR (B,C,E,F, red) or anti-Rip11/FIP5 (A,C,D,F, green) antibodies. Yellow in C and F represents overlap between TfR and Rip11/FIP5. (D-F) High-magnification images of the same cell. Arrowheads in D-F indicate organelles where TfR and Rip11 colocalize. Arrows in D-F indicate organelles where Rip11/FIP5 is enriched in subdomains. Scale bars: 5 µm (A) and 1 µm (D). (G,H) HeLa cells were incubated with transferrin-HRP for 45 minutes at 37°C before being processed for immunoelectron microscopy. Anti-Rip11/FIP5 antibodies were detected using 10 nm gold. The electron-dense DAB reaction product indicates the presence of Tf. Clusters of Tf-positive endosomes that are also positive for Rip11/FIP5 are visible. Scale bars: 500 nm. Inset in H is a higher magnification image of endocytic tubules. Inset in G shows a vesicular part of an early endosome that is negative for anti-Rip11/FIP5 antibodies. Scale bar: 100 nm. Arrows indicate Tf-HRP-containing endosomes that are also positive for Rip11-gold. Arrowheads indicate Rip11 clusters on Tf-HRP endosomes.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Rip11/FIP5 knockdown increases Tf uptake. (A) HeLa cells treated with mock siRNA, Rip11/FIP5 siRNA1 or Rip11/FIP5 siRNA2 were incubated at 37°C with Tf-Alexa488. Cells were then washed, fixed and internalized Tf-Alexa488 measured by flow cytometry. The data shown are the mean ± s.d. of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate time points that are significantly different from mock-treated control at P<0.025. (B) Mock-treated or Rip11/FIP5 siRNA-treated HeLa cells were fixed and incubated with 80 µg/ml Tf-Alexa488 in the absence or presence of 0.4% saponin. Cells were then washed and plasma-membrane-associated (non-permeabilized cells, see figure) and total cellular (permeabilized cells, not shown) Tf-Alexa488 measured by flow cytometry. The data shown are the mean ± s.d. of three independent experiments. (C) Mock- and Rip11/FIP5 siRNA1-treated HeLa cells were incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes with Tf-Alexa488. Cells were then washed and incubated at 37°C with unlabeled Tf. Cell-associated Tf-Alexa488 was measured by flow cytometry and is shown as arbitrary units. The data shown are the mean ± s.d. of three independent experiments. *P<0.01. (D) The rates of Tf uptake and recycling calculated from the data presented in A and C. The data shown are the half-life of uptake and recycling (T1/2) as well as the amount of Tf-Alexa488 internalized and recycled (arbitrary fluorescence units per minute). Data are the mean ± s.d. calculated from three different experiments. *P<0.02.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Rip11/FIP5 knockdown increases colocalization of Tf with TfR. Mock-treated (A-F) or Rip11 siRNA1-treated (J-L) HeLa cells were loaded for 30 minutes at 37°C with 5 µg/ml Tf-Alexa594 (B,C,E,F,H,I,K,L, red). Cells were then washed fixed and stained with anti-TfR antibodies (A,C,D,F,G,I,J,L, green). Yellow in C,F,I and L represents the overlap between Tf-Alexa594 and TfR. D-F and J-L are higher magnification images of boxed areas of mock-treated and Kif3B siRNA1-treated cells, respectively. Scale bars: 5 µm (A,G) and 1 µm (D,J). Arrowheads in D-F indicate organelles enriched in Tf-Alexa594. Arrows in D-F indicate organelles containing TfR but little Tf-Alexa594. Arrowheads in J-L point to large organelles enriched in TfR and Tf-Alexa594. Numbers in A and G give the percentage overlap between TfR and Tf-Alexa594. The data are mean ± s.d. overlap in 25 randomly chosen cells from three different experiments.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Rip11/FIP5 knockdown increases colocalization of Tf with early endosomes. Mock-treated (A-C) or Rip11 siRNA1-treated (D-F) HeLa cells were incubated for 30 minutes with Tf-Alexa488 (A,D and green in C,F). Cells were then washed, fixed and stained with anti-EEA1 antibody (B,E and red in C,F). Yellow colour represents the extent of Tf and EEA1 overlap. Asterisks indicate early endosomes. Insets in C and F are higher magnification images. Numbers in C and F represent the extent of colocalization of Tf-Alexa488 with EEA1. The numbers are the mean ± s.d. from ten random cells. Scale bars: 4 µm.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Kinesin II mediates Rip11/FIP5 binding to microtubules. (A) Glutathione beads coated with GST alone, GST-Kif3A-tail, GST-Kif3B-tail or GST-Kif3C-tail were incubated with HeLa cell Triton X-100 lysates. Beads were then washed and bound Rip11/FIP5 or RCP/FIP1 was analyzed by immunoblotting. The lower molecular size band present only in the GST lane represents a non-specific band since it did not disappear when we use lysates treated with Rip11/FIP5 siRNA (data not shown). (B) Glutathione beads coated with GST alone, GST-Kif3A-tail, GST-Kif3B-tail or GST-Kif3C-tail were incubated with recombinant purified 6His-Rip11/FIP5. Bound 6His-Rip11/FIP5 was detected by immunoblotting. (C) Glutathione beads coated with either GST alone or GST-Kif3B-tail were incubated with Rip11/FIP5(490-652) in the presence or absence of recombinant Rab11a. Bound Rip11/FIP5(490-652) was detected by immunoblotting. (D,E) Rip11/FIP5 binding to microtubules analyzed using microtubule sedimentation assay (see Materials and Methods). Where indicated, assays were performed in the presence off either 5 mM ATP or recombinant Kif3B-tail protein. In the bottom panel, mock-treated or Kif3B siRNA-treated lysates were used in the assay.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Kif3B knockdown increases Tf uptake. (A) Mock-treated or Kif3B siRNA1-treated HeLa cells incubated at 37°C with Tf-Alexa488. Internalized Tf-Alexa488 was measured by flow cytometry. The data shown are the means of two independent experiments. (B) Mock-treated or Kif3B siRNA-treated HeLa cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and incubated with 80 µg/ml of Tf-Alexa488 in the absence of saponin. Plasma-membrane-associated Tf-Alexa488 was measured by flow cytometry. The data shown are the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments. (C) Mock-treated or Kif3B siRNA1-treated HeLa cells incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes with Tf-Alexa488. Cells were incubated with unlabeled Tf. Cell-associated Tf-Alexa488 was then measured by flow cytometry and is shown as arbitrary fluorescence units. The data shown are the mean ± s.d. of three independent experiments. *P<0.025.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Kif3B knockdown results in peripheral accumulation of TfR. (A-C) Kif3B siRNA1-treated cells incubated for 30 minutes with Tf-Alexa488 (A,C, green). Cells were then fixed and stained with anti-EEA1 antibodies (B,C, red). Asterisks in inset in C indicate the early endosomes containing Tf. Yellow in C represents the overlap between Tf-Alexa488 and EEA1. Scale bar: 5 µm.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Rip11/FIP5 and Kif3B regulate the same recycling pathway. (A-C) Mock-treated cells (A) or cells treated with Kif3B siRNA1 (B) or Kif3B and Rip11/FIP5 siRNA1 (C) were incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes with Tf-Alexa488. Scale bars: 5 µm. (D) Proposed model of roles of Rip11/FIP5 and kinesin II in mediating transport to the slow storage pool of endocytic recycling.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008