spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 11 March 2008
doi: 10.1242/jcs.019455

Journal of Cell Science 121, 1036-1045 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alcorn, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Janssen-Heininger, Y. M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alcorn, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Janssen-Heininger, Y. M. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Jun N-terminal kinase 1 regulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition induced by TGF-β1

John F. Alcorn1, Amy S. Guala1, Jos van der Velden1, Brian McElhinney1, Charles G. Irvin2, Roger J. Davis3 and Yvonne M. W. Janssen-Heininger1,*

1 Department of Pathology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
2 Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
3 Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Characterization of primary MTEC. (A) Compared to isolated lung fibroblasts, MTEC expressed cytokeratins and E-cadherin, but were negative for fibronectin and {alpha}-SMA. (B) MTEC expressed the localized tight junctional protein ZO-1, indicative of barrier function (ZO-1 is depicted by the red stain, whereas the green signal represents the DNA counterstain, Sytox Green). (C) Scanning electron micrograph of MTEC depicting well-defined cell-cell contacts, 2500x magnification. (D) Transmission electron micrograph depicting tight junction formation, desmosomes, nuclei, vacuole; 15000x magnification. (E) Primary MTEC established stable TER in culture. Shown are MTEC cultured under submerged conditions, or cultured on ALI in the presence of absence of retinoic acid (30 nM); TER was measured every other day for 18 days. D, desmosome; N, nucleus; T, tight junction; V, vacuole.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Assessment of effects of TGF-β1 in MTEC on expression of mesenchymal and epithelial markers. (A) Evaluation of collagen type 1a1, fibronectin and E-cadherin via immunofluorescence. MTEC were exposed to 5 ng/ml TGF-β1 every other day for 14 days, and prepared for immunofluorescence. Magnification 400x. DAPI illustrates nuclei. (B) MTEC were exposed to 5 ng/ml TGF-β1, and expression of PAI-1 was assessed in cell culture media 24 hours later. {alpha}-SMA protein expression was determined in cell lysates following exposure to 0.5 or 5 ng/ml of TGF-β1 for 6 days. Smad3 represents loading control. Different lanes shown represent results from independent samples. (C) Evaluation of mRNA levels of mesenchymal or epithelial genes in MTEC exposed to TGF-β1 treatment (5 ng/ml, every other day for 10 days). To evaluate reversibility of TGF-β1 responses, MTEC were maintained in culture for 6 additional days in the absence of TGF-β1. mRNA expression was evaluated by real-time PCR analysis, and data normalized to the housekeeping gene HPRT. Results are expressed as fold changes from controls. * P<0.05, ANOVA versus control-treated, ** P<0.05, ANOVA versus TGF-β1-treated.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Evaluation of Smad and JNK signaling in MTEC exposed to TGF-β1. (A) Assessment of Smad2 phosphorylation and Smad4 nuclear localization in MTEC in response to TGF-β1. Phospho-Smad2 and Smad4 were analyzed by western blot of nuclear extracts, after 120 or 240 minutes of exposure to 5 ng/ml TGF-β1. Note that samples were run on the same gels, but irrelevant lanes were deleted for consistency of presentation. (B) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay evaluating binding of nuclear proteins to the consensus SBE in response to TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) for the indicated times. (C) Assessment of phosphorylation of JNK1 and JNK2 following stimulation of MTEC with TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml) for the indicated times. The upper band indicates predominantly JNK2, whereas the lower band mainly reflects JNK1. Fold change denotes differences in signal compared to sham controls based upon densitometric evaluation. The lower panel represents total JNK1 and 2 western blot as loading control. Duplicate lanes in panels A, B and C represent results from independent samples.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. TGF-β1 induces EMT in MTEC in a JNK1-dependent, but JNK2-independent, manner. (A) TGF-β1-induced loss of TER, indicative of barrier disruption, in wild-type MTEC is abrogated in MTEC lacking JNK1–/–, but not in JNK2–/– MTEC. Cells were exposed to 5 ng/ml TGF-β1 every other day for the indicated days of culture. Data are graphed as percentage change in TER from baseline, as recorded over a time period of 10 days. Results represent three independent experiments. Absolute TER readings (Ohms x cm2) before initiation of TGF-β1 exposure were: wild type 1143.3±149.2; JNK1–/– 3521.7±161.4; JNK2–/– 2956.7±150.5 (n=6/group). (B) Comparative evaluation of {alpha}-SMA expression in wild-type, JNK1–/– and JNK2–/– MTEC, exposed to TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml, every other day for 8 days). {alpha}-SMA expression (Red) was detected by immunofluorescence. Green, Nuclear counterstain, Sytox). The percentage of {alpha}-SMA expressing cells was quantified by counting the number of positive cells per field (n>50 cells). (C) Confirmation of genotypes of JNK1–/– or JNK2–/– MTEC by western blot analysis of total JNK.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. Wild-type and JNK1–/– MTEC display similar growth, morphology and production of mucin in culture. (A) Growth curves of MTEC derived from wild type and JNK1–/– were conducted for the indicated times, and cell numbers were assessed by evaluation of total DNA content. (B) Wild-type and JNK1–/– cells established tight junctions, as shown by scanning electron microscopy. (C) Wild-type and JNK1–/– MTEC maintained in ALI for 10 days in the presence of 30 nM retinoic acid produced mucin. Media from two independent cultures from each condition were analyzed by slot blot analysis, using an anti-mucin antibody. Different dots shown represent results from independent samples.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 6. TGF-β1 induces EMT transcriptional responses in MTEC in a JNK1-dependent manner. (A) TGF-β1-induced gene expression changes obtained via microarray analysis are blunted in JNK1 MTEC compared with wild-type cells. Data plot shows the fold change (2n) in gene expression induced by TGF-β1 compared to sham controls (TGF-β1-treated, sham controls) for wild-type MTEC (x-axis) and JNK1–/– MTEC (y-axis). The dashed line depicts the normal distribution expected if the gene expression changes were similar in wild-type and JNK1–/– MTEC. The solid line depicts the mean gene expression changes observed, and indicate a blunted response to TGF-β1 in JNK1–/– MTEC. Horizontal and vertical gray dotted lines represent the twofold change cutoffs. (B) TGF-β1-dependent modulation of mesenchymal and epithelial gene expression in MTEC depends on JNK-1. MTEC were treated with 5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for the indicated times and RNA evaluated by Taqman analysis. Data are represented as fold change in expression compared to sham controls (n=2, representative of five independent experiments). (C) TGF-β1 enhanced expression of known EMT regulatory transcription factors in a JNK1-dependent manner as assessed by Taqman analysis. * P<0.05, ANOVA versus wild-type MTEC. CCSP, clara cell secretory protein; Col1a1, collagen type 1a1; Fn1, fibronectin 1; HMGA 2, high mobility group AT-hook 2; Jag-1, jagged-1; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 7. Evaluation of TGF-β1 pathway activation in wild-type and JNK1–/–-deficient MTEC. (A) Assessment of nuclear accumulation of phospho-Smad2 (P-Smad2), Smad2, P-Smad3, Smad3, Smad4 and P-Jun in wild-type or JNK1–/– MTEC after exposure to 5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 120 or 240 minutes. (B) Assessment of binding of nuclear proteins to the consensus SBE via electrophoretic mobility shift analysis in wild-type or JNK1–/– MTEC after exposure to 5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 120 or 240 minutes. Different lanes shown represent results from independent samples.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008