
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Schematic representation of the molecular interactions at MT plus ends. (A) Current models: the principal pathway for Bik1p localization involves Bik1p transport at plus ends as a cargo of Kip2p. Upon arrival at plus ends, Bik1p recruits dynein, which presumably also interacts with Pac1p. The Bik1p-dynein complex tracks plus ends as a cargo of Kip2p. (B) Present model: in wild-type (wt) strains, Bik1p is transported towards plus ends as a cargo of Kip2p, as in A. Additionally, dynein is recruited by Bik1p during end-ward transport. Upon arrival at plus ends, the Bik1p-Kip2p complex dissociates, and MT end tracking by Bik1p and Kip2p are distinct processes. Bik1p end tracks MTs based on the properties of its CAP-Gly domain, in a complex with dynein and, presumably, Pac1p. (C) Glu MTs: the Glu tubulin mutation disrupts the interaction between Bik1p and tubulin. As a result, Bik1p cannot track MT plus ends. Dynein, by contrast, still tracks plus ends, possibly in a complex with Pac1p. (D) KIP2-deleted strains: if Bik1p is present at plus ends either based on intrinsic interaction with tubulin (wild-type strains) or as a hitch-hiker of Bim1p (Glu tubulin strains), or through both mechanisms, then dynein can be directly recruited at plus ends by Bik1p. Note that Bim1p might localize Bik1p through mechanisms other than hitch-hiking, which is proposed here for the sake of simplicity. Note that D can co-exist with B and C.
|