spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 10 February 2009
doi: 10.1242/jcs.028621


Journal of Cell Science 122, 611-624 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bialas, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leroux, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bialas, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leroux, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Functional interactions between the ciliopathy-associated Meckel syndrome 1 (MKS1) protein and two novel MKS1-related (MKSR) proteins

Nathan J. Bialas1,*, Peter N. Inglis1,*, Chunmei Li1,*, Jon F. Robinson2, Jeremy D. K. Parker1, Michael P. Healey1, Erica E. Davis2, Chrystal D. Inglis1, Tiina Toivonen3, David C. Cottell3, Oliver E. Blacque4, Lynne M. Quarmby1, Nicholas Katsanis2,5,6 and Michel R. Leroux1,{ddagger}

1 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
2 McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
3 Electron Microscopy Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
4 School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
5 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
6 Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic analysis showing that B9-domain-containing proteins from ciliated organisms belong to a family of proteins consisting of three clades or family members, namely Meckel Syndrome 1 protein (MKS-1), MKS-1-related protein 1 (MKSR-1) and MKS-1-related protein 2 (MKSR-2), and sequence comparisons of different B9 domains. (A) Phylogenetic tree of B9-domain-containing proteins from several diverse ciliated eukaryotes. Support for nodes (posterior probabilities) are indicated by blue (1.0), green (>0.9) or red (>0.8) circles. The MKS-1, MKSR-1 and MKSR-2 protein families are shown in blue, green and red, respectively. Scale bar denotes 0.1 substitutions per site. Bd, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis; Ce, Caenorhabditis elegans; Cb, Caenorhabditis briggsae; Cr, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; Dr, Danio rerio; Hs, Homo sapiens; Mm, Mus musculus; Sp, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus; Tb, Trypanosoma brucei; Thaps, Thalassiosira pseudonana; Xl, Xenopus laevis. Supplementary material Table S1 provides the full listing of proteins (with accession numbers) considered in the analysis. (B) Multiple amino acid sequence alignment of 22 B9 protein domains from eight different species. MKS-1, MKSR-1 and MKSR-2 protein sequence names are colored blue, green and red, respectively. Dark blue highlights signify sequences that match the consensus sequence. Light blue sequences do not match the consensus sequence, but have a positive Blosum62 score. Conservation values for each residue are calculated based on identities and conserved physicochemical properties between different amino acid residues in each column. Quality is a measurement of the likelihood of mutations in each column; lower quality signifies greater likelihood of mutations, if any, present between sequences. Species abbreviations are as above except for Tt, Tetrahymena thermophila.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. MKS-1, MKSR-1 and MKSR-2 proteins localize to centrosomes or basal bodies in human cells and transition zones in C. elegans. (A,B) IMCD3 cells transiently expressing constructs encoding V5 epitope-tagged human MKS1, MKSR1 (EPPB9/B9D1) and MKSR2 (LOC80776/B9D2), are shown in the top, middle and bottom panels, respectively. In ciliated IMCD3 cells (A), the V5-tagged MKS1, MKSR1 and MKSR2 proteins (red) colocalize with the centrosomal {gamma}-tubulin marker (green), as seen in the merged images (yellow denotes overlap in signals). Cilia are labeled with an antibody against acetylated tubulin (also green). In ciliated IMCD3 cells stably expressing GFP-tagged versions of the MKS1, MKSR1 and MKSR2 proteins (green) (B), colocalization is observed with the acetylated tubulin antibody (red), which highlights the ciliary axoneme. Arrows denote centrosomes or basal bodies; brackets show the ciliary axoneme. (C) GFP-tagged C. elegans MKS-1, MKSR-1 and MKSR-2 localize specifically to transition zones (akin to basal bodies) in ciliated sensory neurons. Transition zone staining near the tip of the head (left panels) at the base of amphid cilia and near the tail of the animal at the base of phasmid cilia (right panels) are indicated with arrowheads and are shown enlarged in the insets. The relative positions of cilia, transition zones and dendrites are shown in some of the images. Scale bar: 5 µm (insets magnified x3).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Interdependent localization of C. elegans MKS-1, MKSR-1 and MKSR-2 proteins to transition zones. (A-F) The localization patterns of GFP-tagged MKS-1, MKSR-1 and MKSR-2 proteins in the indicated mks-1, mksr-1 or mksr-2 mutant strains are shown in both amphid (head) and phasmid (tail) sensory neurons. Arrowheads indicate representative (individual) transition zones, and asterisks highlight protein accumulations not normally observed for the GFP-tagged MKS-1, MKSR-1 or MKSR-2 proteins in wild-type animals (see Fig. 2C). The orientations of the animals are the same for all, i.e. the head is up and the tail is down. Scale bar: 5 µm.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Single, double and triple C. elegans mks/mksr mutants exhibit normal transition zone positioning, ciliary axonemal structures, intraflagellar transport and chemosensory behaviors. (A) The mks/mksr single, double and triple mutants display normal filling of amphid and phasmid neurons with the fluorescent dye diI, indicating that the cilium structure is probably intact and that the ciliary endings are properly exposed to the external environment; representative images for N2 (wild-type), bbs-8 mutant (dye-filling defective), mks-1;mksr-1;mksr-2 (triple) mutant, and mks-1;mksr-1;mksr-2;bbs-8 quadruple mutant animals are shown. Filled and hollow arrowheads indicate amphid and phasmid neurons that took up dye, respectively. (B) The GFP-tagged CHE-2 (IFT80) intraflagellar transport protein localizes normally to the transition zones (TZ; arrowhead in each panel) and ciliary axonemes (labeled cilia) in both the head and tail sensory neurons of N2 (wild-type), and mks/mksr single, double and triple mutants, as indicated. All panels are oriented with the head up and tail down. Scale bar: 5 µm. (C) The single, double and triple mks/mksr mutants exhibit normal intraflagellar transport. Kymographs of N2 and mutants (mks-1;mksr-1;mksr-2 triple mutant and mks-1;mksr-1;mksr-2;bbs-8 quadruple mutant) are shown for the ciliary middle segment (MS) and distal segment (DS) in the amphid (head) cilia using CHE-2::GFP in intraflagellar transport assays. For each strain, fluorescent images of phasmid cilia and the corresponding kymographs (actual kymographs and schematics/traces of particle movement) for the MS and DS are shown; in the first fluorescent image, the transition zones (TZ) as well as MS and DS are labeled. The table shows the measurement of CHE-2::GFP rates (in µm/second) in the MS and DS for the indicated strains. n, number of IFT particles measured. Note that the rates of CHE-2::GFP movement in the mks/mksr mutants do not deviate statistically from N2; in the bbs-8 background, CHE-2::GFP moves at the fast unitary rate of OSM-3 kinesin in both the MS and DS (Ou et al., 2005Go). The asterisks in the image indicate CHE-2::GFP accumulations normally observed in the bbs-8 mutant background (Blacque et al., 2004Go). Scale bar: 5 µm. (D) IMCD3 cells cotransfected with GFP and short-hairpin RNAi constructs for MKSR1/B9D1 and MKSR2/B9D2 each show a significant reduction in the number of cilia, as assessed by staining with an acetylated tubulin antibody, in comparison with those transfected with GFP alone (control). *P<0.05. (E) The mks/mksr single, double and triple mutants show no statistically significant differences compared with wild-type animals with respect to chemotaxis towards a volatile attractant (isoamyl alcohol) or avoidance of a high-osmolarity solution (8 M glycerol). The osm-5 ciliary mutant, defective in both chemotaxis and osmoavoidance, is included as a positive control. The chemotaxis and osmoavoidance indices are calculated as described in the Materials and Methods. *P<0.05.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Genetic interactions between the C. elegans mks-1, mksr-1 and mksr-2 genes revealed by an increased lifespan phenotype. (A) The mean lifespans of the individual mks-1, mksr-1 and mksr-2 mutant strains (as indicated) are indistinguishable from that of the wild-type (N2) strain. (B) All combinations of double mutant animals (mks-1;mksr-1, mks-1;mksr-2, and mksr-1;mksr-2) exhibit statistically significant increases in lifespan relative to N2 animals (indicated by <0.0001*). The lifespan of the triple mutant is not statistically different from that of the N2 strain. (C) mks/mksr double mutant animals have enhanced lifespans comparable with those of nphp-1 and nphp-4 animals (Winkelbauer et al., 2005Go) but shorter than that of the long-lived strain with a defect in the CHE-11 intraflagellar transport protein. All graphs show representative experiments, and the tables present mean lifespans ± s.e. Experiments were repeated at least twice and the results were found to be reproducible. *P<0.0001 compared with the wild type.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. MKS-1, MKSR-1 and MKSR-2 proteins appear to function upstream of DAF-2 and DAF-16 in the insulin–IGF-I signaling pathway to regulate lifespan. (A) The lifespan of mksr-1;mksr-2;daf-2 triple mutant animals is the same as that of the long-lived daf-2 mutants, supporting the notion that B9-domain-containing proteins function upstream of the DAF-2 insulin–IGF-I signaling pathway. *P<0.0001 compared with daf-2. (B) The lifespan of all mks/mksr double mutants is shortened when introduced into a daf-16 mutant background, suggesting that the MKS-1, MKSR-1 and MKSR-2 proteins function upstream of the DAF-16 FOXO transcription factor in the insulin–IGF-I signaling pathway. *P<0.0001 compared with daf-16. (C) The mks/mksr double mutants have increased levels of DAF-16::GFP in the nucleus, consistent with their increased lifespan compared with wild-type (N2) animals and their corresponding single mutants (mks-1 and mksr-1). The osm-5 ciliary mutant positive control is impaired in DAF-2 signaling and has an increased level of nuclear DAF-16::GFP. Animals were categorized as having mainly cytoplasmic DAF-16::GFP (white bars), intermediate localization between the cytoplasm and nucleus (light gray bars), or mainly nuclear localization (dark gray bars); examples of these three localization patterns are shown on the right. *P<0.05 compared with N2.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009