spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 1, 2009
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.041889


Journal of Cell Science 122, 1184-1191 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sugimoto, N.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sugimoto, N.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Redundant and differential regulation of multiple licensing factors ensures prevention of re-replication in normal human cells

Nozomi Sugimoto1,2, Kazumasa Yoshida1, Yasutoshi Tatsumi1,3, Takashi Yugawa1, Mako Narisawa-Saito1, Shou Waga2, Tohru Kiyono1 and Masatoshi Fujita1,*

1 Virology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuohku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
2 Faculty of Science, Japan Women's University, 2-8-1 Mejirodai, Bunkyouku, Tokyo 112-8679, Japan
3 Division of Biochemistry, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute, 666-2 Nitona, Chuohku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan


Figure 1
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Differences in sensitivities to Cdt1-induced re-replication among three human cell lines. (A) HFF2/T, HEK 293T, and HeLa cells were infected with retroviruses expressing wild-type (WT), T29A or Cy+D1m T7-Cdt1 or with control retroviruses (MOI=1 for HeLa and HEK 293T, and MOI=10 for HFF2/T), and selected with hygromycin B. At 4 days after infection, cells were collected and DNA content was analyzed by flow cytometry. The means and SDs of the percentages of re-replicated cells (the DNA content higher than 4N) from two independent experiments are shown on the right. (B) At 4 days after infection, whole-cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. Actin served as a loading control. The signal intensities of the Cdt1 proteins were quantified, normalized to the signals of actin, and shown with the endogenous Cdt1 in HFF2/T cells set at 1. The means and SDs from two independent experiments are given (lower panel).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Simultaneous deregulation of Cdt1+CDC6 or Cdt1+ORC1 induces re-replication, and triple overexpression synergistically induces strongest re-replication in HEK 293T cells. Cells were transfected with mixtures of the three different expression vectors (T7-Cdt1, Flag-ORC1, 2HA-CDC6) or their empty vectors, as indicated. In all experiments, a GFP expression vector was also included to monitor transfection efficiency. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were analyzed. (A,B) DNA content was analyzed by flow cytometry. In these diagrams, the x-axis is FL2-A (area) and represents whole propidium iodide (PI) signals and thus DNA content. The y-axis is FL2-W (width) and represents the duration of PI signals. Dots with higher FL2-W signals, which result from aggregated cells or cell debris, were excluded from measurement of re-replicated cells. The means and SDs of the percentages of re-replicated cells (the DNA content higher than 4N) from two independent experiments are shown in B. (C) Whole-cell lysates were prepared and subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. GFP served as a control. The signal intensities of the phospho-ATM and phospho-Chk2 proteins were quantified and the means and SDs from two independent experiments are shown with the Cdt1 overexpression alone set at 100 (lower panel). (D) Whole-cell extracts or chromatin- and nuclear-matrix-bound fractions were prepared and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. The signal intensities of the chromatin-bound MCM3 and MCM7 proteins were quantified, normalized to the signals of nuclear lamin C, and shown with the value of control transfectant set at 100. The means and SDs from two independent experiments are given. *P<0.05.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. The CDC6 AAA mutant deficient in Cdk phosphorylation induces stronger re-replication than the when coexpressed with Cdt1 in HEK 293T cells. Cells were transiently transfected with each of the wild-type (WT), AAA or EEE 2HA-CDC6 expression vectors, with or without wild-type T7-Cdt1. In all experiments, a GFP expression vector was also included to monitor transfection efficiency. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were analyzed as for Fig. 2. (A,B) DNA content was analyzed. The means and SDs of the percentages of re-replicated cells from two independent experiments are shown in B. (C) Whole-cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. GFP served as a control. (D) Whole-cell extracts (T), Triton X-100-extractable fractions (S), and nuclear chromatin- and nuclear-matrix-bound fractions (P) were prepared from HEK 293T cells transfected with various 2HA-CDC6s and immunoblotted with anti-CDC6, anti-Lamin A/C (nuclear protein) and anti-Ras (cytoplasmic protein) antibodies. (E) Chromatin- and nuclear-matrix-bound fractions were also immunoblotted with anti-MCM3 and anti-MCM7 antibodies. The signal intensities of the chromatin-bound MCM3 and MCM7 proteins were quantified and normalized to signals for nuclear lamin C; they are shown with the value of the control transfectant set at 100. The means and SDs from three independent experiments are given. *P<0.05.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Simultaneous deregulation of Cdt1+CDC6 or Cdt1+ORC1 induces re-replication, and triple overexpression synergistically induces strongest re-replication in normal human HFF2/T fibroblasts. Cells were co-infected with three different recombinant retroviruses as indicated or with their control empty vectors (MOI=1 for each). Cells were then co-selected with hygromycin B and puromycin. At 4 days after infection, cells were collected and analyzed. (A,B) DNA content was analyzed by flow cytometry. The means and SDs of the percentage of re-replicated cells from two independent experiments are shown in B. (C) Whole-cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. The membranes were also subjected to CBB staining to show equal loading.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009