
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Cincif1 cells display phenotypic differences with Cin hcd_cnx1 cells. (A) Calcofluor staining of Cin cells. Log phase cells (OD595 0.8) were cultured at 30°C or 37°C, and incubated with 20 µg/ml Calcofluor white for 5 minutes. Nomarski-interference images of the same fields of cells stained with Calcofluor are shown above. (B) Sensitivity to cell-wall stress. Exponentially growing cells were adjusted at OD595 0.8, serially diluted (10-1 to 10-4), and spotted on MM plates with or without the indicated chemicals. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 7 days. Results are representative of three independent assays. (C) SDS sensitivity of Cin cells. A volume of 450 µl of a culture at exponential phase (OD595 0.5) was added to 13 ml MM+0.7% agar, and poured on plates containing MM+2% agar. A circle of 3M paper of 5 mm diameter was placed in the center of each plate and 10 µl 10% SDS was added on the circle. Petri dishes were incubated for 7 days at 30°C or at 37°C. The ratio of halos was calculated with respect to WT at 30°C. Results are the average of three independent assays. (D) Metacaspase activity of Cin cells. Metacaspase activity was evaluated by the CaspACE FITC-VAD-fmk fluorescence assay on exponential-phase and 4-day stationary-phase cultures. Stained cells were counted by flow cytometry analysis. Samples of 10,000 cells were analyzed from at least three independent cultures for each strain. Results are the mean of these assays. In (C) and (D), the statistical significance of differences in the results was evaluated by a Student's t-test, pairwise calculated with the lanes indicated. **P<0.01, *P<0.05. Error bars: s.e.m.
|