QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content

Editors and reviewers

Bravo Caveman!

I really enjoyed this one (JCS 114, pp. 1969-1970). Of the "polite" comments I especially liked: "My point was that reviewers should stick to a scholarly critique of the science, as they would expect from the review of their own work." From the flow of antagonism, I could see the indigestion caused by the owl was pouring inspiration into the poison quill. Almost worth sacrificing an owl for my next rebuttal letter.

It would be great if you could attend one of our `editor barbecues' when the snow melts. You may have noticed that the new editors are getting progressively more tender in age, making these events increasingly popular,

All the best,

Alpine Cave Dweller (Vic Small)

P.S. One of the cave post-dogs came out with the wonderful idea to use `expert' as a cave swearword. Since then it has become standard cave chat.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content