Journal of Cell Science 115, e1002-e1002 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited
Different integrin, different signal
The binding of ligands such as fibronectin to cell surface integrins
produces a variety of intracellular signals. An attractive idea is that
different integrin subtypes generate different signals, but strong evidence
for this has been lacking. Shu Chien and co-workers now demonstrate that two
integrin subtypes can indeed activate distinct signalling pathways (see
p. 2199). They show that, when
CHO cells are plated on fibronectin, integrin-ß1-expressing cells produce
lamellipodia and activate Rac a Rho-family GTPase implicated in
induction of lamellipodia. By contrast, integrin-ß3-expressing cells
generate actin stress fibres and activate Rho, which is thought to control
stress fibre formation. Intriguingly, the authors found that expression of a
chimeric construct in which one of the extracellular domains of integrin
ß1 was replaced by the corresponding domain from integrin ß3
produced stress fibres and an increase in Rho activity. Their findings thus
indicate not only that the two integrins signal differently in response to
fibronectin but that differences in the extracellular region rather than the
intracellular region are responsible.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JCS:
- Differential regulation of Rho GTPases by ß1 and ß3 integrins: the role of an extracellular domain of integrin in intracellular signaling
- Hui Miao, Song Li, Ying-Li Hu, Suli Yuan, Yihua Zhao, Benjamin P. C. Chen, Wilma Puzon-McLaughlin, Takehiko Tarui, John Y.-J. Shyy, Yoshikazu Takada, Shunichi Usami, and Shu Chien
JCS 2002 115: 2199-2206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]