spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Propose a workshop for 2011 spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Cell Science 115, e1702-e1702 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited


In this issue

Central vs peripheral circadian oscillators

Circadian oscillators are time-keeping mechanisms that cells use to maintain a 24 hour rhythm and drive periodic expression of genes controlling physiology, metabolism and behaviour. In each oscillator, two interlocked transcriptional and translational feedback loops ensure that the mRNA levels of transcription factors such as Clock (CLK) oscillate out of phase with those of proteins such as Period (PER) that oppose their effects. In a Commentary on p. 3369, Nicholas Glossop and Paul Hardin compare the central `master' clock in the brain with peripheral clocks present in other tissues. Recent work indicates that the central oscillators differ significantly from their peripheral counterparts — for example, in the fly, peripheral oscillators require the blue-light-responsive protein cryptochrome (CRY) whereas the central oscillator does not. Furthermore, studies such as analyses of clock component mRNA cycling have revealed that peripheral oscillators from different species are strikingly similar. On the basis of these observations, Glossop and Hardin argue that the peripheral oscillators from different species reflect a basic clock design, from which central oscillators subsequently diverged.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JCS:

Central and peripheral circadian oscillator mechanisms in flies and mammals
Nicholas R. J. Glossop and Paul E. Hardin
JCS 2002 115: 3369-3377. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?