spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Cell Science 115, e1801-e1801 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited
DOI:


In this issue

The spindle checkpoint: attachment, tension and signalling


The spindle assembly checkpoint ensures that chromosomes segregate correctly at mitosis, delaying anaphase until they are all attached and aligned at the equatorial plane. Central to this checkpoint are kinetochores — proteinaceous complexes that link chromatids to spindle microtubules and seem somehow able to alert the cell if improperly attached. In a Commentary on p. 3547, Harish Joshi and co-workers discuss how the checkpoint signals and what it actually monitors. Recent studies indicate that the checkpoint component Mad2 dynamically associates with and is activated by unattached kinetochores. As part of a mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) containing BubR1 and Bub3, Mad2 then appears to interact with another protein, Cdc20, to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) that drives sister chromatid separation. Other work has focused on whether it is simply kinetochore attachment or the tension created by binding of kinetochore pairs to microtubules emanating from opposite poles that inactivates checkpoint signalling. Although this issue is by no means settled, Joshi and co-workers believe there is strong evidence that both mechanisms operate and that Mad2 and Bub1/BubR1 monitor attachment and tension, respectively.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JCS:

Attachment and tension in the spindle assembly checkpoint
Jun Zhou, Joyce Yao, and Harish C. Joshi
JCS 2002 115: 3547-3555. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?