spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 1. The Q40->A point mutation within the LIM1 domain abolishes the ILK binding and the localization of PINCH to cell-ECM adhesion sites. (A) Three-dimensional structure of the PINCH LIM1 domain. Amino acid residues that comprise the PINCH binding site are labeled. (B,C) Complex formation with ILK. Lysates of C2C12 cells expressing GFP-tagged wild-type or mutant (Q40->A) form of PINCH were mixed with rabbit anti-GPF antibodies. The GFP-PINCH (lane 3) and GFP-Q40A (lane 4) immunoprecipitates were analyzed by western blotting with HRP-conjugated anti-GFP antibodies (B) or mouse monoclonal anti-ILK antibody 65.1 and HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibodies (C). Lanes 1-2 were loaded with cell lysates (13 µg/lane) as indicated in the figure. (D-G) Subcellular localization. C2C12 cells transfected with expression vectors encoding GFP-Q40A (D,E) or GFP-PINCH (F,G) were plated on fibronectin-coated coverslips and stained with a mouse monoclonal anti-paxillin antibody (as a marker of focal adhesions) and a Rhodamine RedTX-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody. GFP-Q40A, GFP-PINCH and paxillin were visualized under a fluorescence microscope equipped with GFP (D,F) and rhodamine (E,G) filters. The experiments were performed three times and similar results were obtained. Bar, 10 µm.





Right arrow Return to article