spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 2. Cells assayed for migratory behaviour in Dunn chambers. (A) Growth medium (+ 10% FCS) without chemoattractant gradient. (B-D) starvation medium (+ 0.1% FCS). (B) No chemoattractant gradient. (C) Concentration gradient of EGF (15 ng/ml in outer well). (D) Concentration gradient of mut C uPA (10 nM in outer well). (A-D) Cell trajectories over 5 hours (10 median cell trajectories). The start point for each cell is coordinate (0,0); The end point is marked by a closed circle; the chemoattractant source is at the top of plot; axis graduations, distance (µm). Circular histograms show the proportion of cells with migratory direction lying within each 20° interval (chemoattractant source at top of histogram). Cells that migrated less than 20 µm were excluded from analysis. The red arrow represents the mean direction of migration; the green segment represents the 95% confidence interval determined by the Rayleigh test. Displacement shows the percentage of cells that migrate further than 20 µm. Concentration-dependent response for (E) EGF, (F) wt uPA (open circles) and mut C uPA (closed circles). (G) Effect of ß1-integrin neutralising antibody and mouse IgG antibody on chemotaxis stimulated by 10 nM mut C. More than 40 cells pooled from three to six experiments included in analyses.





Right arrow Return to article