spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 6. SFRP1 activities do not modify ß-catenin transcriptional activity. (A) Immunoblot analysis of cytosolic ß-catenin levels in MDCK/control or MDCK/SFRP1 treated retina cells harvested after three and five hours of culture. Cytosolic fractions were prepared and immunoblotted with antibodies against ß-catenin and {alpha}-tubulin (load control). Normalized density values (NDV) expressed in arbitrary units indicate no differences among the fractions. (B) Luciferase assay showing that SFRP1 does not modulate the endogenous level of ß-catenin/TCF-dependent transcription in E5 chick dissociated retinal cells. Cells were co-transfected with the reporter plasmid containing the Lef-1 responsive element (C4) or its mutated version (MUT), the control plasmid pRLTK and the effector plasmids in each case. Either 500 ng or 1 µg of Sfrp1 were transfected alone or in combination with 500 ng of Wnt8. 500 ng of Wnt8 or ß-catenin activate the reporter gene 240 and 130 fold, respectively. The two concentrations of Sfrp1 decreased Wnt8 activity 4 and 10 fold, respectively. 1 µg of dnGSK3ß did not activate the reporter. Luciferase activity is expressed in a logaritmic scale.





Right arrow Return to article