spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 6. Differences in fibroblast migration to TSP1 and hep I. (A) Wild-type and CRT-knockout (KO) MEF migration in response to serum-free media, with or without hep I (100 nM), TSP1 (7.8 nM) or FBS (0.1%), was assessed as previously described. Average cell migration speed under each condition was determined by dividing total migration distance by the total time of the assay. At least 75 cells were analyzed for each condition. n=3-4, *P<0.05, **P<0.01. (B) Percent of cells migrating under each condition was determined by dividing the number of cells migrating at least 0.06 microns/minute by the total number of cells. At least 75 cells were analyzed for each condition. n=3-4, *P<0.05, **P<0.01. (C) Total cellular displacement was determined as the difference between final cell position and initial cell position. At least 75 cells were analyzed for each condition. n=3-4, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. (D) Directionality of cell migration was determined by dividing the total cellular displacement by the total distance of migration. Under this method, a purely directional response will show a ratio of 1, whereas increasingly random migration responses will show ratios approaching zero. At least 75 cells were analyzed for each condition. n=3-4, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.





Right arrow Return to article