spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Cell Science 116, e801-e801 (2003)
Copyright © 2003 The Company of Biologists Limited


In this issue

Networks: from structure to information processing


Cellular tensegrity is a model for cell architecture in which microfilaments and intermediate filaments bear tensional forces and these are balanced by elements that resist compression, such as microtubules and matrix adhesions. In part II of a two-part Commentary on the subject, Donald Ingber discusses how tensegrity architecture might provide a basis for biocomplexity by allowing cells to integrate chemical and physical signals into a network from which complex behaviours can emerge (see p. 1397). Several studies indicate that mechanical stress applied to integrins at the cell surface can induce cytoskeletal reorganization, signal transduction and gene expression. Moreover, at the whole cell level, cell shape distortion is able to switch cells between gene programmes that lead to distinct cell fates – growth, differentiation or apoptosis – and alterations in cytoskeletal pre-stress (a critical parameter in cellular tensegrity) have been shown to influence tissue patterning. Ingber suggests that tensegrity thus represents the hardware behind living systems, the signalling machinery being the software. In the context of this dynamic information-processing network, he proposes that cell fates can be viewed as `attractors' – stable states whose formation is an emergent property of the network.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JCS:

Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks
Donald E. Ingber
JCS 2003 116: 1397-1408. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?