spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 1. The intracellular domain of CD21 interacts with FHOS. (a) in yeast. A GAL4 activation domain plasmid encoding the C-terminal amino acids of FHOS was serially diluted (10–1-10–4; UD, undiluted) and co-transformed into a yeast reporter strain with plasmids encoding the GAL4 DNA binding domain fused to one of the following: the 34 aa residues of the CD21 cytoplasmic tail (CD21-CT), the 34 aa residues of the CD21 cytoplasmic domain plus nine residues of the transmembrane domain (CD21-TMCT), lamin, the 105 aa residues of the CAR cytoplasmic domain (CAR-CT), or bacteriophage T7 gene 2 (T7/gp2; see Materials and Methods). Co-transformants were selected on minimal medium. Growth (i.e. activation of the HIS3 reporter) indicates a positive interaction. +C (positive control) represents co-transformation of plasmids encoding SNF1 and SNF4, proteins that interact in the two-hybrid assay. (b) In vitro. Purified fusion proteins expressing the C terminus of FHOS, GST-FHOS, GST alone or GST-TK (irrelevant protein) were incubated with cell lysates prepared from the B-cell lines Raji (CD21+; lanes 2-4) and Nalm6 (CD21–; lanes 5 and 6). Proteins interacting with FHOS were co-purified on glutathione beads, separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by immunoblot using a monospecific rabbit anti-CD21 antiserum. A total protein lysate from Raji cells (lane 1) was analyzed as a CD21 positive control. (c) In vivo. 293T cells were transfected with pG5{Delta}CAT-EGFP (reporter) plus the desired combination of bait (pM-X) and target (pVP16-X) vectors as indicated. X denotes the fusion protein of interest. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were identified with Hoechst (nuclear stain), fixed, and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Fluorescent EGFP+ cells indicates a positive interaction between bait and target fusion proteins. Top panel (method verification): EGFP induction was assessed using positive control vectors (pM53-VP16 and pM-53 + pVP16-T) compared with negative control vectors (pM-53 + pVP16-CP, control protein; Clontech). Middle panel: EGFP induction following co-transfection of recombinant vectors encoding the cytoplasmic domain of CD21, CD21.CT together with the C terminus of FHOS, FHOS.CT. Right and left panels show reciprocal experiments. Bottom panel (control), EGFP induction following transfection of CD21.CT or of FHOS.CT together with cognate two-hybrid vectors encoding irrelevant proteins (T antigen or p53).





Right arrow Return to article