spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 3. Repetitive sub-threshold Schaffer-collateral stimulation (100 microseconds, 1 Hz) revealed postsynaptic depolarisations of unequally distributed amplitudes in GluR-type glial cells. Extracellular field potentials and membrane potentials of a GluR cell were simultaneously recorded in a p11 mouse (Vrest=–80 mV, Ri=400 M{Omega}, Cm=30 pF). (A) Typical pairs of recording traces are given. Single stimulation pulses caused stable dendritic field potentials (A1,2 upper traces, C upper trace) and time-correlated glial depolarizations of up to 7.3 mV (A1, lower trace) or glial failures (A2, lower trace). Spontaneous glial depolarisations were observed in a few cases (A3 arrow, 0.9 mV). (B) The average of 119 successively recorded pairs of traces is depicted with different time scaling. (B1) Field potentials showed only synaptic potentials (449±65 µV) without postsynaptic population spikes, as visualized at higher time resolution. (B2) The corresponding glial ePSPs averaged out at 2.4±1.8 mV. (C) The time course of field potential amplitudes (crosses, upper trace) and GluR cell ePSPs is plotted. While field potentials remained almost unchanged, the glial responses represented a mixture of failures and depolarisations over the 2 minutes recording period (circles, lower panel). (D) The amplitudes of the glial ePSPs were clearly non-Gaussian distributed (D1). The noise amplitude histogram was received from analysing baseline recorded at resting potential (1 second, corresponding to 3106 points) and fitting to a Gaussian function (D2). The Gaussian fit displayed a half width of 124±5 µV and peaked at –80.7±0.09 mV. For clarity, the centre was scaled to 0 mV. All data in this figure were obtained from the same GluR cell, [Cl]i was always 135 mM.





Right arrow Return to article