spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 1. The effect of ceramide on IHERG density in stably expressing HEK293 cells. (A) Whole-cell current recordings of IHERG in the absence and presence of 10 µM ceramide or dihydro-ceramide. From a holding potential of –80 mV cells were stepped to potentials between –70 mV and +40 mV for 2 seconds with tail currents observed on repolarisation to –60mV for 4.5 seconds. Inset, Identification of IHERG by the use of the inhibitor cisapride (1 µM) with the current evoked by a depolarising step to 0 mV. (B,C) Voltage-dependence of IHERG density with IHERG measured at the end of the depolarising steps (B) and as peak tail current (C). {square}, control, n=12; {bullet}, 10 µM ceramide, n=9. Significant differences in current density were observed (*P<0.05, ** P<0.001) compared to levels in the control. (D) Instantaneous IHERG density-voltage plot. Insets show the effect of 10 µM ceramide on the instantaneous IHERG density at 0 mV and the voltage protocol used, which consisted of a 2 second activating step to +40 mV, a 13 msecond step to –100 mV to relieve inactivation and then a step to potentials between +50 mV and –20 mV. IHERG was measured immediately following the end of the brief hyperpolarising step (n=7 for both control ({square}) and 10 µM ceramide ({bullet}); *P<0.05). (E) The effect of ceramide concentration on the instantaneous IHERG density at 0 mV (voltage protocol as in D). The number of cells tested are given in parentheses (*P<0.05 compared to control current).





Right arrow Return to article